Cool, thanks for pointing those items out!
Please see comments below.
On Jun 2, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm following the same tutorial. I finally could make it fully work with WO
> (creating, updating, deleting, etc).
>
> I did the following changes:
>
> 1) SC
Hi! I'm following the same tutorial. I finally could make it fully work with WO (creating, updating, deleting, etc). I did the following changes: 1) SC expects variables to be camel-cased and not underscored. The SproutCore format created on ERRest was set to underscore variables, so isDone was
OK, so here was the issue.
In the Todos tutorial Chapter 7 they have you add a method to handle the server
response.
didFetchTasks: function(response, store, query) {
if(SC.ok(response)) {
store.loadRecords(Todos.Task,
response.get('body').content
LOL. I was thinking it would be a good idea from a WO publicity standpoint to
try to get ERRest as one of the data types in the example.
I'm going to try emailing the sproutcore group, I'll let you know when I get it
worked out.
best,
Johnny
On May 25, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
I don't have an answer for you, but if you get it working, please
update this page :-)
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WONDER/SpoutCore+and+ERRest
Hi,
I'm trying to work through the sample sproutcore application found
here: http://wiki.sproutcore.com/Todos%C2%A0Int
Sproutcore didn't go anywhere did it?
Tim Worman
UCLA GSE&IS
On Apr 20, 2010, at 5:22 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
> http://forums.appleinsider.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=108852
>
> So what happened to the chocolaty sounding framework?
>
>
> James Cicenia
>
>
>
>
>
> _
Cappuccino is very much alive and kicking. I've played with both very
recently, and they each have strengths and weaknesses. I think any potential
user needs to sit down and evaluate both. I personally prefer Capp for the
Objective J syntax, I find SproutCore's hybrid JavaScript implementatio
i would encourage you to use the ERRest framework for a backend to sproutcore,
though ... for the frontend, though, i would just do it the way SC recommends.
On Jan 3, 2010, at 1:58 PM, Mark Woollard wrote:
> OK - thanks
> Mark
>
> On 3 Jan 2010, at 17:49, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> Don't use SC
OK - thanks
Mark
On 3 Jan 2010, at 17:49, Mike Schrag wrote:
> Don't use SC framework in Wonder.
>
> Anjo -- how do you feel about just deleting that SC framework in Wonder?
>
> ms
>
> On Jan 3, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Mark Woollard wrote:
>
>> Just started to take a look at sproutcore and the Pro
Good?
Cheers, Anjo
Am 03.01.2010 um 18:49 schrieb Mike Schrag:
> Don't use SC framework in Wonder.
>
> Anjo -- how do you feel about just deleting that SC framework in Wonder?
>
> ms
>
> On Jan 3, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Mark Woollard wrote:
>
>> Just started to take a look at sproutcore and th
Don't use SC framework in Wonder.
Anjo -- how do you feel about just deleting that SC framework in Wonder?
ms
On Jan 3, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Mark Woollard wrote:
> Just started to take a look at sproutcore and the Project Wonder wrappers
> seem to want sproutcore-0.9.20 and the current version i
On 22/dic/2009, at 13.25, David Avendasora wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2009, at 2:52 PM, David Holt wrote:
>
>> On 2009-12-21, at 1:43 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
>>
>>> Forget it, it's not worth the bother.
>>
>> I don't think that Anjo is saying that SC is not worth the bother. He's
>> saying that the
On Dec 21, 2009, at 2:52 PM, David Holt wrote:
> On 2009-12-21, at 1:43 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
>
>> Forget it, it's not worth the bother.
>
> I don't think that Anjo is saying that SC is not worth the bother. He's
> saying that the experimental SC framework in Wonder is not worth trying to
> m
On 2009-12-21, at 1:43 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
> Forget it, it's not worth the bother.
I don't think that Anjo is saying that SC is not worth the bother. He's saying
that the experimental SC framework in Wonder is not worth trying to make work.
It was made with an old version of SC and at a mini
Forget it, it's not worth the bother.
Cheers, Anjo
Am 21.12.2009 um 20:00 schrieb Jerald Dawson:
> Does anyone know of a tutorial for working with the sproutcore frameworks in
> wonder? I know very little about SC expect for what I've read on their
> website. I installed the SC gem but it se
:-)
On 18/feb/09, at 15:55, Anjo Krank wrote:
Not so fast :) I'm saying is that SC is currently before 1.0, god
knows what they all changed, but the build system is amongst it. But
they will go final at the end of the month and it's not worth
anyones time to even look at the WO integration
Not so fast :) I'm saying is that SC is currently before 1.0, god
knows what they all changed, but the build system is amongst it. But
they will go final at the end of the month and it's not worth anyones
time to even look at the WO integration before it's out.
Cheers, Anjo
Am 18.02.2009 u
Hi,
It's ok, I do not want to bother, I saw the SproutCore example and I
was just curious...
That's all :-)
I just did not understand what Anjo would say :-)
Regards
Amedeo
On 18/feb/09, at 15:49, Mike Schrag wrote:
What I'd waste my time with? Dunno. Something with more purpose :)
I don'
What I'd waste my time with? Dunno. Something with more purpose :)
I don't know if Anjo is saying not to use SC at all, or just not the
SC framework in Wonder. Definitely the SC framework in Wonder is out
of sync with SC trunk, and I wouldn't bother using it ... Call it a
failed experiment.
What I'd waste my time with? Dunno. Something with more purpose :)
Cheers, Anjo
Am 18.02.2009 um 15:41 schrieb Amedeo Mantica:
? can u explain better?
thanks
Amedeo
On 18/feb/09, at 15:37, Anjo Krank wrote:
There are a few posts on the wonder list. However, as SC is
currently right befo
? can u explain better?
thanks
Amedeo
On 18/feb/09, at 15:37, Anjo Krank wrote:
There are a few posts on the wonder list. However, as SC is
currently right before 1.0 and the build-tools have been rewritten,
I'd probably waste my time with something else...
Cheers, Anjo
Am 18.02.2009 u
There are a few posts on the wonder list. However, as SC is currently
right before 1.0 and the build-tools have been rewritten, I'd probably
waste my time with something else...
Cheers, Anjo
Am 18.02.2009 um 15:33 schrieb Amedeo Mantica:
I tried before this posting, obviously
I thin
I tried before this posting, obviously
I thing there are missing files in order to run the example, I do not
know where to get it
Regards
Amedeo
On 18/feb/09, at 14:17, Ken Anderson wrote:
Amedeo,
I have no idea, but I would like to make a suggestion. Try to make
it work first. If
Amedeo,
I have no idea, but I would like to make a suggestion. Try to make it
work first. If you've tried, looked through the documentation and the
mailing lists, and you're still not successful, post what you did and
what didn't work so that people have a starting point to help you.
Ke
On 16-Jun-08, at 10:01 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/06/16/apples_open_secret_sproutcore_is_cocoa_for_the_web.html
This SproutCore framework is getting a lot of play. Anybody here use
it yet?
Just wondering It sure is fun being an Apple developer th
25 matches
Mail list logo
