Ok -
Next year I have to go. June is so bad for me, but, I will make it
happen next year. But, since we are all waiting, I guess I don't
feel so left out.
James
On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
James, you should have come to WOWODC!
Gianduia has not yet been released..
James, you should have come to WOWODC!
Gianduia has not yet been released... we saw it, were blown away by
it, but we don't have it, so all we can do is dream about having it as
soon as it is released. :-)
On Jun 10, 2009, at 7:59 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
What is this Gianduia? And where
A few things here need addressing.
On Jun 09, 2009, at 11:08, John Huss wrote:
I believe JavaClient uses the standard Java serialization, which is
a binary format. Generating the format in Javascript is probably
not feasible; if it was I'm sure the GWT folks would have used it,
but they d
What is this Gianduia? And where do I get some?
Is this a new chocolate bar or such from that famous SanFran
chocolatier?
-James
On Jun 9, 2009, at 10:23 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:08 AM, John Huss wrote:
I believe JavaClient uses the standard Java serialization,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Joe Little wrote:
> Much thanks on that last paragraph. I wouldn't have gathered that from
> the presentation, but it now makes me smile just a little more now :)
>
sorry, this is in regards to using these technologies in basic web
pages just as much as a full RIA
Much thanks on that last paragraph. I wouldn't have gathered that from
the presentation, but it now makes me smile just a little more now :)
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>> No, I thought it wasn't really clear either - I thought it was local
>> storage at first too, but it's
On Jun 9, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Not sure what part of EOF ...
btw, why can't you go back to asking EASY questions where I don't
have to work so hard :)
Can I have a pony?
Dave
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will b
Not sure what part of EOF ...
btw, why can't you go back to asking EASY questions where I don't have
to work so hard :)
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple
No, I thought it wasn't really clear either - I thought it was local
storage at first too, but it's not - It's a Javascript CoreData
implementation accessing an ERXRest backend on the server. If I'm
wrong someone please correct me.
Also, you would have to rewrite EOEditingContext and relat
No, I thought it wasn't really clear either - I thought it was local storage
at first too, but it's not - It's a Javascript CoreData implementation
accessing an ERXRest backend on the server. If I'm wrong someone please
correct me.
John
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:23 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Jun 9, 2009, at 12:18 PM, John Huss wrote:
Also, you would have to rewrite EOEditingContext and related
classes in Javascript, which is a fairly large task.
But I thought that was part of what Gianduia did and what made it so
much cooler than last years rich-client-of-the-moment Sprou
> Also, you would have to rewrite EOEditingContext and related classes in
> Javascript, which is a fairly large task.
>
>
> But I thought that was part of what Gianduia did and what made it so much
> cooler than last years rich-client-of-the-moment Sprout Core.
>
Yes, but CoreData != EOF. They ar
Cannot wait for Gianduia ... hope Pierre Frisch & Co. release this
soon. Gianduia, the new killer javascript technology for data-driven
apps.
On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:23 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:08 AM, John Huss wrote:
I believe JavaClient uses the standard Java
On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:08 AM, John Huss wrote:
I believe JavaClient uses the standard Java serialization, which is
a binary format. Generating the format in Javascript is probably
not feasible; if it was I'm sure the GWT folks would have used it,
but they didn't.
Hmmm. I wonder if it wou
I believe JavaClient uses the standard Java serialization, which is a binary
format. Generating the format in Javascript is probably not feasible; if it
was I'm sure the GWT folks would have used it, but they didn't.
Also, JavaClient's serialization is HEAVY since the whole EC is transferred
(I t
But you opened it. If I had written "Java Client does Client Side WO
Best," you never would have.
:-P
Dave
On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
Damn, that was a disappointment. I opened this thread and was hoping
for a viable "get rich quick" scheme!
- hugi
On 9.6.2009,
Damn, that was a disappointment. I opened this thread and was hoping
for a viable "get rich quick" scheme!
- hugi
On 9.6.2009, at 14:57, David Avendasora wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question that I think I can finally put into words after an
excellent WOWODC, especially the session on Javas
Hi all,
I have a question that I think I can finally put into words after an
excellent WOWODC, especially the session on Javascript Clients.
Why not use the already built-in com.webobjects.eodistribution classes
as the interface for passing EOs and such back and forth instead of re-
invent
18 matches
Mail list logo
