On 29/06/2006, at 8:46 AM, Scott Henderson wrote:
First, Thank You to all who have responded and participated to my
post.
Good information.
Tim, I am particularly interested in your newbie experience. As I
mentioned, OO programming is going to be a new experience for me.
I like the pr
One source I found very useful for the "philosophy" of OO with Java is
Bruce Eckel's "Thinking in Java" ebook:
http://www.mindview.net/Books/TIJ/
I originally came to OO through C++ & Booch, but moving to Java I
still found this invaluable.
John
On 6/29/06, Miguel Arroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
bject-Based Programming,
thus, I will need to devote substantial time acquiring the needed
skills. That is why I ask about the State of WebObjects... is it
worth investing one's valuable time or has it been superceded by new,
improved technologies?
Thanks for any commen
Hi Scott (et al.),A couple of points:Firstly, I don't think you have to worry (in the short to medium term) about WO's status. It is a part of Apple's Xcode development platform now and I see it becoming a more and more significant component as time goes on (and the world becomes even more Web cent
On 28-Jun-06, at 5:08 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
On 2006/06/28, at 21:31, David LeBer wrote:
2. Shrinking list of development options
What do you mean?
Sorry, sloppy composition, my bad. I'm typing without the use of my
right hand right now (separated shoulder due to a bicycle accid
Scott et al:
Excellent suggestions from Miguel.
Also, it has been said that Chuck Hill's book is for more advanced WO
practitioners. Personally, I recommend it as well because you may
need to solve specific problems in your first project that you just
don't know how to approach. Chuck's bo
Hi!
I strongly recommend you to read the "Object Oriented Programming"
of this book: http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/
Conceptual/ObjectiveC/ObjC.pdf
Although it's about ObjC, it's one of the best OO introductions I
have ever seen. Of course, it covers the "object" concep
. That is why I ask about the State of WebObjects... is it
worth investing one's valuable time or has it been superceded by
new, improved technologies?
Thanks for any comments.
Scott
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be i
First, Thank You to all who have responded and participated to my post.
Good information.
Tim, I am particularly interested in your newbie experience. As I
mentioned, OO programming is going to be a new experience for me. I
like the procedural approach... it seems natural and logical. Tha
I've enjoyed learning to be a curmudgeon. :-)
I can speak to this topic being pretty fresh. I do agree that prior
to taking on my current project (which really necessitated learning
something more powerful like WO), I was attracted to more procedural,
interpreted languages. It really has ta
I think there's something about interpreted languages that makes a
psychological difference for "non-programmers". Perl, PHP, Ruby,
Javascript all attract many of the same types of people (not that
Ruby doesn't attract programmer types as well, but those languages
all tend to attract "no
On 28 Jun 2006, at 22:39, Miguel Arroz wrote:
On 2006/06/28, at 22:20, Paul Lynch wrote:
You mean "fun", not "funny". That's a common misuse of English
that is cropping up on lists more and more recently.
Ops... I'm not a native english speaker... what's the difference?
"Fun" is enjoy
Hi!
On 2006/06/28, at 22:20, Paul Lynch wrote:
On 28 Jun 2006, at 22:08, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Rails is an interesting contender, and I'm glad to see a new well
designed framework on the field. But it is still very young and
has a long way to go before it equals the richness of WO.
1 mo
On 28 Jun 2006, at 22:08, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Rails is an interesting contender, and I'm glad to see a new well
designed framework on the field. But it is still very young and
has a long way to go before it equals the richness of WO.
1 month = 30 * day... rails has some funny stuff, but
Hi!
On 2006/06/28, at 21:31, David LeBer wrote:
2. Shrinking list of development options
What do you mean?
4. Some are concerned about Apples commitment to the platform. (I
have to say I am not one of them.)
Apple will present some conferences about WO in WWDC, specially
one about
On 28-Jun-06, at 3:44 PM, Scott Henderson wrote:
Hi,
I am researching WO for use in an upcoming project.
Welcome.
Since I am new to this list, I do not have a feel for what is going
on with WO or the WO Community.
I would love to hear Good/Bad comments concerning the WO
Development Env
, as well.
I might also point out that I am new to Object-Based Programming,
thus, I will need to devote substantial time acquiring the needed
skills. That is why I ask about the State of WebObjects... is it
worth investing one's valuable time or has it been superceded by new,
imp
17 matches
Mail list logo
