As super does the same thing without WORequest, I don't see why it's
needed. But no, it isn't (without resorting to pretty fugly
refelction). Go write a bug report against WO for this unneeded and
unfriendly change of public api...
Cheers, Anjo
Am 30.10.2007 um 01:04 schrieb Andrew Lindesa
Hello Anjo;
I suppose if one wanted to fiddle with the headers and then call
super this is not going to work is it?
cheers.
Actually, to be able to compile, you have to write:
public WORequest createRequest(String aMethod, String aURL, String
anHTTPVersion, NSDictionary someHeaders, NSD
Three's a charm. Yes, you're right (almost, you have to say
(someInfo == null ? null: new NSDictionary(someInfo, false))).
Cheers, Anjo
Am 29.10.2007 um 19:56 schrieb Art Isbell:
On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:30 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Actually, to be able to compile, you have to write:
public W
On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:30 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Actually, to be able to compile, you have to write:
public WORequest createRequest(String aMethod, String aURL, String
anHTTPVersion, Map someHeaders, NSData aContent, NSDictionary
someInfo) {
return _createRequest(aMethod, aURL, anHTTPVers
Actually, to be able to compile, you have to write:
public WORequest createRequest(String aMethod, String aURL, String
anHTTPVersion, NSDictionary someHeaders, NSData aContent,
NSDictionary someInfo) {
return _createRequest(aMethod, aURL, anHTTPVersion, new NSDictionary
(someHeaders, fals
Bla Wonder, bla:
public WORequest createRequest(String aMethod, String aURL, String
anHTTPVersion, NSDictionary someHeaders, NSData aContent,
NSDictionary someInfo) {
// Workaround for #3428067 (Apache Server Side Include module will
feed
// "INCLUDED" as the HTTP version, which cau
Hello;
Has anybody else identified a 5.3 and 5.4 API compatible means of
overriding "WOApplication.createRequest(...)" ? I presume this is
not possible.
cheers.
___
Andrew Lindesay
technology : www.lindesay.co.nz
business : www.silvereye.co.nz
___
