Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread Michael Gargano
well don't worry, i've generalized it for n-dialogs with a little jquery and lots of pain. my app's gonna look like a mahjong table! :) -mike On Aug 22, 2011, at 10:57 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > The model I had in mind when I made this was more of a modal inspector than a > fist-full of sticky

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread Chuck Hill
The model I had in mind when I made this was more of a modal inspector than a fist-full of sticky notes. :-) On 2011-08-22, at 6:56 PM, Michael Gargano wrote: > as I've said before, I just work here. not my design. in some places it's > up to 3 or 4 modals on top of each other. (ducks for c

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread Michael Gargano
as I've said before, I just work here. not my design. in some places it's up to 3 or 4 modals on top of each other. (ducks for cover) I've now been given the nickname popup-boy [insert lewd comment here] -mike On Aug 22, 2011, at 8:02 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > > On 2011-08-22, at 4:54 PM,

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread Tim Worman
On Aug 22, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > I've done things like updating the AMD with different content. I have a very large modal dialog though that actually acts a view portal to a WOComponent that holds collection of information - all child components. So, it is less "dialog" than "fu

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread David Avendasora
On Aug 23, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: >> I'll miss him. >> >> Sort of. > > You will have to drink my share then. Damn. First Hugi's share, now yours. On top of that, living in a dry country isn't exactly doing wonders for my tolerance. Well, actually it is. Now I'm a cheap(er) date.

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread Chuck Hill
I've done things like updating the AMD with different content. On 2011-08-22, at 4:59 PM, Tim Worman wrote: > On Aug 22, 2011, at 4:54 PM, David Avendasora wrote: > >> On Aug 23, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Michael Gargano wrote: >> >>> This is a modal dialog on top of a modal dialog >> >> Wow. I think

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread Chuck Hill
On 2011-08-22, at 4:54 PM, David Avendasora wrote: > On Aug 23, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Michael Gargano wrote: > >> This is a modal dialog on top of a modal dialog > > Wow. I think I heard Chuck's head explode all the way over hear in Borneo. It was more of imploding and exiting the opposite ear.

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread Tim Worman
On Aug 22, 2011, at 4:54 PM, David Avendasora wrote: > On Aug 23, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Michael Gargano wrote: > >> This is a modal dialog on top of a modal dialog > > Wow. I think I heard Chuck's head explode all the way over hear in Borneo. LOL. I've seen where this is ill-advised. In all serious

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread David Avendasora
On Aug 23, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Michael Gargano wrote: > This is a modal dialog on top of a modal dialog Wow. I think I heard Chuck's head explode all the way over hear in Borneo. I'll miss him. Sort of. Dave ___ Do not post admin requests to the list.

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread Michael Gargano
On Aug 22, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > > On 2011-08-22, at 8:13 AM, Michael Gargano wrote: > >> Just the default constructor, which implicitly calls super. All the model >> classes are EOGenerated. Any other ideas to check? > > Awake from insertion? Checked it, looks good. The w

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread Chuck Hill
On 2011-08-22, at 8:13 AM, Michael Gargano wrote: > Just the default constructor, which implicitly calls super. All the model > classes are EOGenerated. Any other ideas to check? Awake from insertion? Bad modelling. Are you using inheritance and have duplicate PKs in different tables? All

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread Ken Anderson
Are you sure the relationship's being called on the right object? If it's the result of a to-one relationship that doesn't exist, it could be an automatically created "phantom" object. In the case of cascading popups, I typically initialize all levels in appendFromResponse if they're null. Fo

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-22 Thread Michael Gargano
Just the default constructor, which implicitly calls super. All the model classes are EOGenerated. Any other ideas to check? Thanks. -Mike On Aug 19, 2011, at 3:39 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > Sounds like you forgot to call super someplace in your EOs. > > > On 2011-08-19, at 12:27 PM, Michael

Re: faulting relationship problem

2011-08-19 Thread Chuck Hill
Sounds like you forgot to call super someplace in your EOs. On 2011-08-19, at 12:27 PM, Michael Gargano wrote: > Hi all, > > I have cascading popup buttons that are narrowing down to a particular > instance of an entity and one of the popups is populated with the field from > a relation

faulting relationship problem

2011-08-19 Thread Michael Gargano
Hi all, I have cascading popup buttons that are narrowing down to a particular instance of an entity and one of the popups is populated with the field from a relationship on that entity. So, the fetch spec. has a qualifier consisting of the values of all the previous choices and