Re: Thanks Stefan! (mod_proxy)

2024-03-08 Thread Aaron Rosenzweig via Webobjects-dev
update, we got stuck deploying to production environment last night and gave up but we kept looking into it and deployed mod_proxy today and preliminary reports show people are happy. We had missed the part about adding a header: x-webobjects-adaptor-version We had it in staging but overlooked it in

Re: Thanks Stefan! (mod_proxy)

2024-03-08 Thread Michael Schmiedgen via Webobjects-dev
On 3/8/2024 1:55 AM, Aaron Rosenzweig via Webobjects-dev wrote: Thank you Stefan, Johann, and the community for making the switch from mod_Webobjects.so adaptor to the built-in Apache mod_proxy module. It helped us out this week to dig up Stefan’s 2015 video presentation on this topic

Thanks Stefan! (mod_proxy)

2024-03-07 Thread Aaron Rosenzweig via Webobjects-dev
Thank you Stefan, Johann, and the community for making the switch from mod_Webobjects.so adaptor to the built-in Apache mod_proxy module. It helped us out this week to dig up Stefan’s 2015 video presentation on this topic, utilize the ERXApplication cookie generation, and the migration tab in

mod_proxy and 'refuse new sessions' ?

2020-02-12 Thread René Bock via Webobjects-dev
Hi all, has anyone an idea how to setup a WebObjects deployment using mod_proxy (instead of mod_webobjects) which supports the "refuse new session" feature? As far as I know, for mod_proxy it is only possible to mark an instance unconditionally as "not responding". Bes

Re: mod_proxy error

2016-09-06 Thread Chuck Hill
Date: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 2:26 PM To: Chuck Hill Cc: WebObjects-Dev Mailing List List Subject: Re: mod_proxy error Chuck, I have set it to a fairly high number: ulimit -n shows 524288 Michael Kondratov Aspire Auctions, Inc. 216-231-5515 On Sep 6, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Chuck Hill mailto:ch

Re: mod_proxy error

2016-09-06 Thread Michael Kondratov
From: on behalf > of Michael Kondratov > Date: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 2:21 PM > To: WebObjects-Dev Mailing List List > Subject: mod_proxy error > > Also geting the following errors in proxy error log: > > > Tue Sep 06 17:19:08.785587 2016] [proxy:debug]

Re: mod_proxy

2016-09-06 Thread Chuck Hill
Which version of WO are you using? https://jenkins.wocommunity.org/job/Wonder6/javadoc/com/webobjects/appserver/WOCookie.html From: on behalf of Michael Kondratov Date: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 2:14 PM To: WebObjects-Dev Mailing List List Subject: mod_proxy Hello, I am trying to set

Re: mod_proxy error

2016-09-06 Thread Chuck Hill
“Too many open files” Try increasing the limits. Chuck From: on behalf of Michael Kondratov Date: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 2:21 PM To: WebObjects-Dev Mailing List List Subject: mod_proxy error Also geting the following errors in proxy error log: Tue Sep 06 17:19:08.785587 2016

mod_proxy error

2016-09-06 Thread Michael Kondratov
Also geting the following errors in proxy error log: Tue Sep 06 17:19:08.785587 2016] [proxy:debug] [pid 4498] proxy_util.c(1766): AH02338: copying shm[0] (0x10adcb018) for worker: http://127.0.0.1:2001/cgi-bin/WebObjects/webapps.woa [Tue Sep 06 17:19:08.785596 2016] [proxy_balancer:debug] [pid

mod_proxy

2016-09-06 Thread Michael Kondratov
Hello, I am trying to set up a new deployment using mod_proxy. Copied the Applocation sample code from Monitor and getting an error on line: WOCookie cookie = new WOCookie(_proxyBalancerCookieName, _proxyBalancerRoute, _proxyBalancerCookiePath, null, -1, context.request().isSecure

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-12-31 Thread Jeffrey Schmitz
HI Tom, I’m very interested in getting mod_proxy working for deployment as I have one server running Mountain Lion that suddenly started returning “requested application not found” errors and I can’t get it working again using the mod_webobjects adaptor method. I had a couple of questions

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-10-26 Thread Chuck Hill
As Johann indicated, you don't need wotaskd running in order for the requests to get from Apache to the app. You do need something to start them. And if you want to stop them with a Web UI and have scheduling, crash notification etc, then Monitor and wotaskd are something that works. Chuck

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-10-26 Thread Johann Werner
Without wotaskd you will have to start your instances with all necessary program arguments yourself, i.e. on OS X you have to write some launchd scripts. Does that solve your problem? jw Am 26.10.2014 um 17:13 schrieb Tom Woteki : > All: > > Contrary to Chuck’s remark, I was not able to unlo

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-10-26 Thread Tom Woteki
All: Contrary to Chuck’s remark, I was not able to unload wotaskd and still have the successful configuration I posted elsewhere in this thread continue to work. Whereas I have dispensed with mod_webobjects I still require both the WOMonitor and wotaskd daemons running. Tom > On Aug 12, 20

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-10-24 Thread Tom Woteki
re the mod_proxy action is as follows: LoadModule proxy_module libexec/apache2/mod_proxy.so LoadModule proxy_balancer_module libexec/apache2/mod_proxy_balancer.so ProxyRequests On ProxyMaxForwards 1 ProxyVia Full BalancerMember http://www.foobar.com:2001/cgi-bin/WebObjects/foobar.woa

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-10-24 Thread Stephen Quirk
r than apache adapter? >> >> Michael >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Aug 12, 2014, at 19:22, Paul Hoadley wrote: >> >>> Hi Larry, >>> >>> On 13 Aug 2014, at 7:12 am, Larry Mills-Gahl wrote: >>> >>>&g

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-10-24 Thread Fredrik Lindgren
tov" wrote: > > What makes mod proxy better than apache adapter? > > Michael > > Sent from my iPad > > On Aug 12, 2014, at 19:22, Paul Hoadley <mailto:pa...@logicsquad.net>> wrote: > >> Hi Larry, >> >> On 13 Aug 2014, at 7:12 am, Larr

how to migrate using mod_proxy?

2014-10-23 Thread Tom Woteki
All: As others have noted, Yosemite upgrade has broken deployment using mod_WebObjects.so compiled for web server 2.2. After reviewing some threads here I have tried migrating using mod_proxy with no success on a test machine. Although I get the message “JavaMonitor has migrated your

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-08-12 Thread Chuck Hill
he adapter? Michael Sent from my iPad On Aug 12, 2014, at 19:22, Paul Hoadley mailto:pa...@logicsquad.net>> wrote: Hi Larry, On 13 Aug 2014, at 7:12 am, Larry Mills-Gahl mailto:elem...@gmail.com>> wrote: I’m new to the mod_proxy config also (but I’m digging it… thanks Chuck) One piece

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-08-12 Thread Michael Kondratov
What makes mod proxy better than apache adapter? Michael Sent from my iPad > On Aug 12, 2014, at 19:22, Paul Hoadley wrote: > > Hi Larry, > >> On 13 Aug 2014, at 7:12 am, Larry Mills-Gahl wrote: >> >> I’m new to the mod_proxy config also (but I’m digging it…

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-08-12 Thread Paul Hoadley
Hi Larry, On 13 Aug 2014, at 7:12 am, Larry Mills-Gahl wrote: > I’m new to the mod_proxy config also (but I’m digging it… thanks Chuck) > > One piece that I needed to do in addition to setting the proxy config from > the Migrations tab was to add this line to the a

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-08-12 Thread Larry Mills-Gahl
I’m new to the mod_proxy config also (but I’m digging it… thanks Chuck) One piece that I needed to do in addition to setting the proxy config from the Migrations tab was to add this line to the apache config: RequestHeader append x-webobjects-adaptor-version “mod_proxy" Prior to that

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-08-06 Thread Paul Hoadley
On 6 Aug 2014, at 10:10 pm, Theodore Petrosky wrote: > I’m looking, Paul you mentioned that it is disabled by default. How did you > turn it on? I am looking and hacking but I don’t see the setting. It's an application property for JavaMonitor. In Resources/Properties you will see: # Hide th

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-08-06 Thread Theodore Petrosky
or (and if a property has not disabled >> it) you should see a Migration (Migrations?) tab on the right side. That >> should give you instructions and a mod_proxy config that matches the current >> JavaMonitor setting. I believe this is the work of Anjo. And, yes, it >>

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-08-06 Thread Paul Hoadley
On 6 Aug 2014, at 9:01 am, Chuck Hill wrote: > If you are using Wonder’s JavaMonitor (and if a property has not disabled it) > you should see a Migration (Migrations?) tab on the right side. That should > give you instructions and a mod_proxy config that matches the current >

Re: mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-08-05 Thread Chuck Hill
If you are using Wonder’s JavaMonitor (and if a property has not disabled it) you should see a Migration (Migrations?) tab on the right side. That should give you instructions and a mod_proxy config that matches the current JavaMonitor setting. I believe this is the work of Anjo. And, yes

mod_proxy as mod_WebObjects alternative [Was: Re: Yosemite]

2014-08-05 Thread Paul Hoadley
Hi Chuck, On 6 Aug 2014, at 2:27 am, Chuck Hill wrote: > I’d take a long, hard look at moving to mod_proxy and ending this dependance > on third party Apache plugins. Unless your configuration changes frequently > this seems like a better choice. Tell me more. Is this somet

Re: mod_proxy question

2006-03-03 Thread Wolfram Stebel
Am 03.03.2006 8:52 Uhr schrieb "Mark Morris" unter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm not sure if this was one of the things you were pointing out, but > notice how the internetsports.de site uses frames to keep the > WebObjects URL from appearing in the location bar (which I believe > was part of your or

Re: mod_proxy question

2006-03-02 Thread Mark Morris
I'm not sure if this was one of the things you were pointing out, but notice how the internetsports.de site uses frames to keep the WebObjects URL from appearing in the location bar (which I believe was part of your original question). Regards, Mark On Mar 3, 2006, at 1:42 AM, Wolfram Steb

Re: mod_proxy question

2006-03-02 Thread Wolfram Stebel
Am 02.03.2006 23:25 Uhr schrieb "David Chaney" unter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Wolfam, > > Check out this site... pretty useful for this sort of thing: > http://www.jewelryluv.com/fashion/pageWithName/ModRewrite/ Sorry for beeing rebellious: Open www.webclubs.de and www.internetsports.de I

Re: mod_proxy question

2006-03-02 Thread Mark Morris
"http://my.server.de/cgi-bin/WebObjects/myApp.woa/wa/myAction"; returned to the client as "http://my.server.de/"; Can i do this with: ProxyPassReversehttp://my.server.de/http://my.server.de/.* ??? Do i need to set "ProxyRequests On" if it works this way? I looke

Re: mod_proxy question

2006-03-02 Thread David Chaney
;http://my.server.de/cgi-bin/WebObjects/myApp.woa/wa/myAction"; returned to the client as "http://my.server.de/"; Can i do this with: ProxyPassReversehttp://my.server.de/http://my.server.de/.* ??? Do i need to set "ProxyRequests On" if it works this way? I looked

mod_proxy question

2006-03-02 Thread Wolfram Stebel
http://my.server.de/.* ??? Do i need to set "ProxyRequests On" if it works this way? I looked into mod_rewrite and mod_proxy and cant find a solution. Pleas help :-) Wolfram ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignore