+1
> On Jul 4, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
>
> "Those who do not understand WebObjects are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.”
>
>
>> On 3. júl. 2015, at 20:04, Chuck Hill wrote:
>>
>> There are probably only so many ways to do it right, so after they have
>> exhausted doing i
"Those who do not understand WebObjects are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.”
> On 3. júl. 2015, at 20:04, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> There are probably only so many ways to do it right, so after they have
> exhausted doing it wrong you end up with a familiar pattern. One thing that
> I find amu
There are probably only so many ways to do it right, so after they have
exhausted doing it wrong you end up with a familiar pattern. One thing that I
find amusing after years of how fantastic JS is because it has no types, that
there is now so much interest in stronger typing. This whole indus
http://www.webcodegeeks.com/javascript/angular-js/angular2-hello-world/
Is it just me, or does Angular2 (apparently a huge re-write from v1)
written with TypeScript (a typed superset of Javascript) look like, oh
I don't know, WebObjects and Java? :-)
Strange days indeed.
- ray
