Re: [websec] New draft of HTTP header-based public key pinning

2011-11-09 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2011-11-09 01:31, Tom Ritter wrote: My notes: I believe the BNF (pseudo-BNF?) is incorrect: Public-Key-Pins = Public-Key-Pins : LWS directives directives = max-age LWS ; LWS fingerprints / fingerprints LWS ; LWS max-age max-age = max-age LWS =

Re: [websec] New draft of HTTP header-based public key pinning

2011-11-09 Thread Adam Barth
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Steingruebl, Andy asteingru...@paypal-inc.com wrote: -Original Message- From:  Chris Palmer  - There is no directive or suggestion to User Agents about saving or not saving pins received in a private browsing mode.  Maybe there shouldn't be, but if a

Re: [websec] New draft of HTTP header-based public key pinning

2011-11-09 Thread Steingruebl, Andy
-Original Message- From: Adam Barth [mailto:i...@adambarth.com] We battled this problem with HSTS as well.  I think what Mozilla settled on (and I don't remember the Chrome solution) is to use a different storage mechanism when HSTS is *set* during private browsing mode, and clear

Re: [websec] New draft of HTTP header-based public key pinning

2011-11-09 Thread Adam Barth
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Steingruebl, Andy asteingru...@paypal-inc.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Adam Barth [mailto:i...@adambarth.com] We battled this problem with HSTS as well.  I think what Mozilla settled on (and I don't remember the Chrome solution) is to use a

Re: [websec] font sniffing

2011-11-09 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 10/25/11 12:42 AM, Tobias Gondrom wrote: On 25/10/11 07:30, Martin J. Dürst wrote: On 2011/10/25 11:34, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:43:25 +0900, Martin J. Dürst due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp wrote: But who is at fault is not what we are interested in here I think. We are

Re: [websec] New draft of HTTP header-based public key pinning

2011-11-09 Thread Chris Palmer
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-17.html#rfc.section.3.1 So decide whether you want to allow multiple header fields (in which case you should use the ABNF list notation used in

Re: [websec] New draft of HTTP header-based public key pinning

2011-11-09 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2011-11-09 21:09, Chris Palmer wrote: On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Julian Reschkejulian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-17.html#rfc.section.3.1 So decide whether you want to allow multiple header fields (in which case you should