Re: [websec] of quoted-string header field param value syntax (was: Strict-Transport-Security syntax redux)

2012-01-14 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2012-01-14 01:24, =JeffH wrote: In terms of this question of whether the STS header field directive ABNF should be.. 1) directive = token [ = ( token | quoted-string ) ] ..or.. 2) directive = token [ = token ] ..I can see both sides of the argument. However, I've been thinking about it

Re: [websec] #34: HSTS cache manipulation and misuse by server enabled by wildcard cert

2012-01-14 Thread Yoav Nir
Interesting. But I don't see how subdomains help. If I have a website called charcount-5.example.com, and I use a wildcard *.example.com certificate, the HSTS entry is still written for charcount-5.example.com. Adding subdomains would affect *.charcount-5.example.com, not 0-H.example.com. I

Re: [websec] #34: HSTS cache manipulation and misuse by server enabled by wildcard cert

2012-01-14 Thread Adam Barth
Why not just postMessage of the HTML form element? If you want be more sneaky about it, you can just the HTTP cache. Anyway, web sites are allowed to send messages to each other. Adam On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:52 PM, websec issue tracker trac+web...@trac.tools.ietf.org wrote: #34: HSTS cache