-Original Message-
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.resc...@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:54 PM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: apps-disc...@ietf.org; websec@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] AppsDir review of
On May 2, 2012, at 10:48 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
2) There's a common axiom that says it's safer to refer to a definition
rather than to copy it.
I think we should recognize that as a false axiom and move on.
We should refer to orthogonal definitions that are subject to
independent
[ resent with correct Subject: ]
Hi Alexey, thanks for the review, apologies for latency.
The two directives defined in this specification are described below.
The overall requirements for directives are:
o The order of appearance of directives is not significant.
o All
New rev:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07
full issue ticket list for strict-transport-sec:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/query?status=assignedstatus=closedstatus=newstatus=reopenedcomponent=strict-transport-secorder=id
Redline spec diff from
