On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:
Hi, thanks for the response. Comments inline:
On Jul 29, 2012, at 10:29 PM, =JeffH jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com wrote:
-- I did not find any guidance on how to handle UAs that do not understand
this extension. I don't know if this needs
Sorry. forgot to CC this list.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Yoav Nir y...@checkpoint.commailto:y...@checkpoint.com
Subject: [saag] WebSec status
Date: August 2, 2012 9:15:07 AM PDT
To: s...@ietf.orgmailto:s...@ietf.org s...@ietf.orgmailto:s...@ietf.org
WebSec met at 9:00 AM on Tuesday
Hi, thanks for the response. Comments inline:
On Jul 29, 2012, at 10:29 PM, =JeffH jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com wrote:
-- Does this draft update any other RFCs (e.g. 2616 or 2818)? If so, that
should be explicitly flagged and mentioned in the abstract.
Good question, I don't believe
Jeff and I spoke f2f. Pending actual text, I believe we have resolutions to all
of my comments save those about an extension registry, which Jeff will discuss
with other interested parties.
Thanks!
Ben.
On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote:
Hi, thanks for the
