Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence

2013-05-24 Thread websec issue tracker
#55: Clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence Changes (by pal...@google.com): * status: assigned = closed * resolution: = fixed Comment: Per discussion on the list, adopted Sleevi's text but changed evict to ignore. https://code.google.com/p/key-pinning-

Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence

2013-03-28 Thread Yoav Nir
The text works for me. On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:54 PM, websec issue tracker trac+web...@grenache.tools.ietf.org wrote: #55: Clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence Comment (by pal...@google.com): Ryan Sleevi has added text to the working copy that I believe resolves

Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence

2013-03-27 Thread websec issue tracker
#55: Clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence Comment (by pal...@google.com): Ryan Sleevi has added text to the working copy that I believe resolves this ticket. Comments? https://code.google.com/p/key-pinning-

Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence

2013-03-27 Thread Tom Ritter
The UA MUST evict all expired Known Pinned Hosts if at any time, an expired Known Pinned Host exists in the cache I use rrdtool to keep 5 years of statistics for my server. Once, I accidentally set the date forward, to 2038, wiping out my statistics - there was no way to recover, because

Re: [websec] #55: Clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence

2012-10-19 Thread websec issue tracker
#55: Clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence Changes (by palmer@…): * status: new = assigned -- -+--- Reporter: palmer@… | Owner: palmer@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: major