Re: [websec] Comments on draft-abarth-principles-of-origin-00, was: Reviews of draft-ietf-websec-origin and principles-of-origin until end of May

2011-06-21 Thread Tobias Gondrom
Hi Adam, FWIW my opinion is in favour of merging the two. Reasons: 1. principles is rather short and gives a good context and introduction to origin, so it seems appropriate to merge them both together. 2. if I would consider origin referencing principles, there might be a larger number of

Re: [websec] Comments on draft-abarth-principles-of-origin-00, was: Reviews of draft-ietf-websec-origin and principles-of-origin until end of May

2011-06-21 Thread Tobias Gondrom
Sorry, I forgot to clarify in my previous email: my comment was my opinion as individual. hat type='individual'/ ;-) (not as WG chair) On 21/06/11 17:38, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: hat type='individual'/ Agreed. Plus, at some point in the future, people will look for that RFC about same origin

Re: [websec] Comments on draft-abarth-principles-of-origin-00, was: Reviews of draft-ietf-websec-origin and principles-of-origin until end of May

2011-06-17 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 6/15/11 9:59 PM, Adam Barth wrote: I was hoping other folks would weigh into the thread. In the interest of moving forward, I'm going to combine them into one document but try to structure the document so that folks who aren't interested in the nuts and bolts can still get the high-level