[websec] test

2017-01-20 Thread =JeffH
test ___ websec mailing list websec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec

[websec] test pls ignore

2015-01-13 Thread =JeffH
test ___ websec mailing list websec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec

Re: [websec] Test of XHR in HTML mail

2011-12-13 Thread Gervase Markham
On 12/12/11 20:07, Richard L. Barnes wrote: > In fact, it doesn't look like they're even processing the onload > handler for the element (except for Gmail). That black line > you see is a collapsed , and it should be hidden on load. Maybe > MUAs just aren't supporting Javascript? --Richard It's

Re: [websec] Test of XHR in HTML mail

2011-12-12 Thread Richard L. Barnes
In fact, it doesn't look like they're even processing the onload handler for the element (except for Gmail). That black line you see is a collapsed , and it should be hidden on load. Maybe MUAs just aren't supporting Javascript? --Richard On Dec 12, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrot

Re: [websec] Test of XHR in HTML mail

2011-12-12 Thread Richard L. Barnes
Figured it might be interesting to have an empirical test of how MUAs handle origin-bound things like XHRs. In my tests (Mail.app, Thunderbird, Gmail), none of the MUAs seemed to do anything; they didn't even display the failure message. My guess is that they just don't support XHR, but I ha

[websec] Test of XHR in HTML mail

2011-12-12 Thread Richard Barnes
The plain text form of this message isn't very interesting. ___ websec mailing list websec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec