On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 15:49, Erich Christian erich_...@irq.at wrote:
Hi Jean,
Am 07.05.2011 00:53, schrieb Jean Hollis Weber:
Now that I'm openly working with TDF under my own name, may I have write
access to libreoffice.org, with publishing rights? Account name is
jeanweber. Thanks!
Hi,
Earlier, the page
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
correctly guessed my deb installation.
Now it suggests rpm download.
Maybe something has changed ?
(Could be my update from Ubuntu 10:10 11:04 ?)
Best,
Cor
--
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- giving openoffice.org its
+1
2011/5/6 Goldfish goldf...@aol.in:
Hi,
Could we please have a LibreOffice Download stats website/webpage?
Something like:
http://glow.mozilla.org/
Thanks,
Paul
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more:
Hi Paul, *,
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Goldfish goldf...@aol.in wrote:
Could we please have a LibreOffice Download stats website/webpage?
Something like:
http://glow.mozilla.org/
While there surely will be download statistics (the script to generate
statistics form log/db still needs
Hi,
to get the list of approved members tot he TDF website will not work
without using sub menus. If I just add members at the top menu, it
gets to wide (and wraps around).
So I'm currently going to place members and application under
Foundation. To me this seems quite logical - but maybe
The subject of a documentation blog came up on the Docs list. We're just
floating ideas at the moment, but I wanted to check on one practical
issue.
If Docs wanted to set up a blog, should we do it at wordpress.com or
similar and have it added to the TDF planet, or should we do it some
other way?
Hi,
Am 07.05.2011 13:06, schrieb erich_...@irq.at:
AFAIK it worked with the link 'Application' without wrapping, so I'd
suggest to leave 'Members' on top level with the application below - makes
both pages imho more easy to find than to hide them like now - and doesn't
place the huge TDF link
Hello Jean,
2011/5/7 Jean Hollis Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
The subject of a documentation blog came up on the Docs list. We're just
floating ideas at the moment, but I wanted to check on one practical
issue.
If Docs wanted to set up a blog, should we do it at wordpress.com or
similar and
Hi,
Am 07.05.2011 13:06, schrieb erich_...@irq.at:
[leave 'Members' on top level]
this looks even more weird to me, as I now have
Current
Members of
The Doument
Foundation
projects
as category title in the side menu.
Arghl... typical case of misimagination!
Hi,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-05-07 13.57:
We have no policy. You're free to do pretty much what you think should be
best. We could share a blog with the Docs team or open a new one (it's on
wordpress.com, really), but there we have people who are more experts than I
am.
at the moment,
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 22:04 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-05-07 13.57:
We have no policy. You're free to do pretty much what you think should be
best. We could share a blog with the Docs team or open a new one (it's on
wordpress.com, really), but
Hi *,
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Jean Hollis Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 22:04 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
[...]
Thank you both for your answers. I want to make sure I don't break any
policies because of ignorance. ;-)
I think the best approach would
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 00:20 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Jean Hollis Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 22:04 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
[...]
Thank you both for your answers. I want to make sure I don't break any
13 matches
Mail list logo
