On 5/1/12, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> "previously existing code" refers to Oracle copyrighted code, which is
> LGPLv3
>
> "new code" is the code developed since September 28, 2010, with double
> license LGPLv3/MPL, by TDF developers
>
Wow awesome! What a clear answer is!
Thanks bro.
--
Regards,
JiHu
Jihui Choi wrote:
> I'm really sorry, but what are "previously existing code" and "new
> code"? I don't get it at all because there's no boundary something
> like that. Well at one certain time, we can say, these are "existing
> code" and those are not, not yet, they are still new. However later
>
On 4/30/12, Cor Nouws wrote:
> That is for new code committed to LibreOffice, visible here
>http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=grep&q=
> LGPLv3 is for previously existing code.
>
Well, I can't understand clearly.
As my known LibO is under LGPLv3, that means it applys to all o
Hi Choi!
Jihui Choi wrote (27-04-12 03:21)
on http://www.libreoffice.org/download/license/,
"LibreOffice is licensed under the terms of the LGPLv3 (new
contributions are dual-licensed under both LGPLv3+ and MPL)."
Is anyone who explains what "new contributions" indicate exactly?
Is that "exten
Hello.
I'm translating libreoffice.org site to Korean.
For that I need to understand very clearly and exactly.
I have a question.
on http://www.libreoffice.org/download/license/,
"LibreOffice is licensed under the terms of the LGPLv3 (new
contributions are dual-licensed under both LGPLv3+ and MPL
