i +1 this
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:30 AM, C wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2012 9:45 AM, "Jonathan Aquilina"
> wrote:
> >
> > Is there a way that all new contributions have to be approved by wiki
> admins that way we filter any spam as well as in a way new contributions
> but ensure quality of the contr
On Oct 13, 2012 9:45 AM, "Jonathan Aquilina" wrote:
>
> Is there a way that all new contributions have to be approved by wiki
admins that way we filter any spam as well as in a way new contributions
but ensure quality of the contributions in terms of is whats being said in
that wiki page does it w
Is there a way that all new contributions have to be approved by wiki
admins that way we filter any spam as well as in a way new contributions
but ensure quality of the contributions in terms of is whats being said in
that wiki page does it work in terms of a feature if you do this does this
happen
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Friedrich Strohmaier
wrote:
> From my point of view there is more than one alternative :o)).
>
> In short:
> 1. We want (new) contributors contribute without hassles
> 2. We don't want spammer's contributions
>
> We could solve that through changing the workflow (t
Hi Florian, *,
Am 10.10.2012 11:46 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
> Rainer Bielefeld wrote on 2012-10-10 09:31:
>> My concerns written on "[libreoffice-website] Re: Does wiki want to come
>> out and play? - Problem - ReCaptcha" still exist.
> the alternative is to close down self-creation of accou
