On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 07:44 +0200, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> thanks for your explanations.
>
Howdy K-J,
> So I have to excuse me to do it 'arbitrarily'.
> It was done in one process with the leaving of the Litmus link Sophie
> mentioned with hard facts.
> I think that it
Hi Drew,
thanks for your explanations.
Am 26.04.2011 21:49, schrieb drew:
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 21:19 +0200, ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote:
Hi Nino, all,
it is not about the Litmus link but about the Alfresco link.
Hi K-J,
Ok - let's stick to the alfresco link.
The Litmus link wont be the
Hi K-J,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 21:19, ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote:
> it is not about the Litmus link but about the Alfresco link.
Ok, sorry. But then it would be better to keep the discussion on the
Alfresco thread.
I did not read the Alfresco thread at all as I did not have the time to
Hi David, all,
after re-rereading some of the messages, I now realize my own
misunderstanding: I've mixed up Alfresco and Litmus issues as the
Alfresco thing was talked about in the Litmus thread. My fault, sorry
for that.
So my communication analysis (which you have not read anyways) is
the
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 21:19 +0200, ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote:
> Hi Nino, all,
> it is not about the Litmus link but about the Alfresco link.
Hi K-J,
Ok - let's stick to the alfresco link.
> The Litmus link wont be the problem. It isn't of any interests by David.
> Let me describe it:
> David
Hi Nino, all,
it is not about the Litmus link but about the Alfresco link.
The Litmus link wont be the problem. It isn't of any interests by David.
Let me describe it:
David made a link to Alfresco on the top menu. He doesn't tell us why he
do so. He has no need do to so.
I asked him why and he
Hi David, all!
Also some comments from my side, since I hope it might improve how we
talk to each other.
Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 01:50 +0800 schrieb David Nelson:
> Hi Nino,
>
> Just so history does not get twisted, the true facts are that I had
> originally added a link to the LibreOffice
Hi David,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 19:50, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Nino,
>
> Just so history does not get twisted, the true facts are that I had
> originally added a link to the LibreOffice Alfresco platform in the
> LibreOffice wiki top menu, alongside the links to other LibO/TDF
> resources. Kla
Hi Nino,
Just so history does not get twisted, the true facts are that I had
originally added a link to the LibreOffice Alfresco platform in the
LibreOffice wiki top menu, alongside the links to other LibO/TDF
resources. Klaus-Jürgen Weghorn arbitrarily removed it. I put it back
again.
As regards
Hi David,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 15:51, David Nelson wrote:
> I have not read your entire post above, but frankly I consider this
> kind of discussion unsuitable, off-topic, misrepresenting the facts
> and personally unpleasant.
Well - it was just an attempt.
Personally, I was offended by
Hi Nino, :-)
I have not read your entire post above, but frankly I consider this kind of
discussion unsuitable, off-topic, misrepresenting the facts and personally
unpleasant. I had thought that the "atmosphere" on the website had calmed
down in comparison to the beginning of the year but it seems
11 matches
Mail list logo
