[fedora-websites] Issue #1038: Fedora podcast site

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I'm going to open this up for someone else to take. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1038 ___ websites mailing list --

[fedora-websites] Issue #1038: Fedora podcast site

The issue: `Fedora podcast site` of project: `fedora-websites` has been reset by duffy. https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1038 ___ websites mailing list -- websites@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[fedora-websites] Issue #1038: Fedora podcast site

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @sadin Hey I think we had an email thread a couple weeks or so ago, have you made any progress on this one? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1038

Re: Where are the sources for the spins websites located?

Hey Carson, With a new logo coming up for Fedora, those pages are definitely slated for a redesign. Our process involves doing mockups first. We would love to see your ideas! One of the things we are looking to do is merge the spins and labs sites into one since the distinction have proved to

[fedora-websites] Issue #964: Download page for Fedora CoreOS

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @bgilbert does the above design look reasonable? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/964 ___ websites mailing list --

[fedora-websites] Issue #964: Download page for Fedora CoreOS

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Also see https://pagure.io/fedora-web/websites/issue/4 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/964 ___ websites mailing list --

[fedora-websites] Issue #964: Download page for Fedora CoreOS

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` These are some mockups I worked on based on the new getfedora.org design. The only thing kind of funky here is the filters for viewing only stable / testing / next releases... I don't know if they are necessary or not; it's mocked up

[fedora-websites] Issue #964: Download page for Fedora CoreOS

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @bgilbert hey I had a draft logo for Fedora CoreOS a while back that I did for bbread but I think it may have been updated / modified by the Brand team - do you know about this or know how I can get the latest / official / approved

[fedora-websites] Issue #950: Spins and labs not linked from redesigned website

The status of the issue: `Spins and labs not linked from redesigned website` of project: `fedora-websites` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by duffy. https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/950 ___ websites mailing list --

[fedora-websites] Issue #950: Spins and labs not linked from redesigned website

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` We could probably close this ticket then. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/950 ___ websites mailing list --

[fedora-websites] Issue #950: Spins and labs not linked from redesigned website

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I handed this off to @ryanlerch and @relrod so I don't know the current status of staging, but, the original intention was to have an area with sliders to highlight labs and spins, see mockup here:

Re: Suggestions for Website

No I'm less concerned about that although I'd put it on the about page and not as a new footer link. ~m On March 22, 2019 1:08:53 PM EDT, Brian Proffitt wrote: >Does this include the addition of a governance link in the site footer? > >BKP > >On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 9:36

Re: Suggestions for Website

onstrate different platform availability and >seems >less clunky than what I proposed. Could that be a possibility? > >Thanks, >Brian > >On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:56 PM Máirín Duffy >wrote: > >> Hi Brian, >> >> Thanks for the analysis and

Re: Suggestions for Website

Hi Brian, Thanks for the analysis and info! For the alt download links - do we want or need to emphasize their availability? Is there more context for who needs these, how common a need that would be, etc? Bc a better solution could be - for example - upgrading a particular link from an alt

Re: Introduction

Hi Manan! We can totally use your help. It's late where I am right now but I'm going to post a writeup of what we're looking for either tomorrow or Monday next week. Hang tight! Cheers, ~m On September 13, 2018 2:38:07 AM EDT, Manan Goel wrote: >Hi Guys >I'm Manan and I'm a Computer Science

[fedora-websites] Issue #788: IoT web site / landing page

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Posting the design review of the mockup so far from @kylerconway : K_REY_C[m] (IRC) I actually love the workstation/server/etc. graphics without the circles and hovering slightly above and out of the containing box. It doesn't draw

[fedora-websites] Issue #788: IoT web site / landing page

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I want to post what I have so far for you @robyduck . I worked on this today and yesterday. It seems the front page needed a refresh anyway. Does this make sense so far?

[fedora-websites] Issue #788: IoT web site / landing page

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @mattdm @robyduck are we dropping atomic edition at some point or is that staying or being replaced with something else? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/788

[fedora-websites] Issue #761: add language button to fedoracommunity.org

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` we can do a redesign from the ground up if there's interest. let me know, we can open up a design team ticket for mockups. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/761

Release screenshots

Hey, Marketing has a release deliverable every release to produce screenshots. Here is the F27 ticket for this work: https://pagure.io/fedora-marketing/issue/266 It seems we are not coordinated between the websites and marketing team on producing these and maybe are duplicating work? Last

[fedora-websites] Issue #756: Idea for consideration: Redirect front page of fedoraproject.org to new overview docs

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` What is generating docs.fedoraproject.org? It's not using Fedora bootstrap? Who created this theme? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/756

[fedora-websites] Issue #756: Idea for consideration: Redirect front page of fedoraproject.org to new overview docs

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @mattdm that ticket says "though note that improvement to the overall look of the docs site (including styles, fonts, etc.) are out of scope and a separate design project." I don't understand. Does that mean the CSS can't be fixed? ``

[fedora-websites] Issue #756: Idea for consideration: Redirect front page of fedoraproject.org to new overview docs

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @mattdm if that redirect was set up as-is I think we'll have a lot of confusion about which is the 'real' fedora website, and if one is meant to place the other. I suggest changing the title on the docs docs one to say something like

[fedora-websites] Issue #736: Should we add https://fedoraproject.org/easyfix/ to the footer

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` you could put the easy fix link or a section about easy fix where the join link points - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/736

[fedora-websites] Issue #736: Should we add https://fedoraproject.org/easyfix/ to the footer

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` to the footer of getfedora.org? if so, no - getfedora is for users... `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/736 ___ websites

[fedora-websites] Issue #695: Let's get Fedora higher on search results for "Linux"

duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @mattdm we need more people. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/695 ___ websites mailing list --

Re: Introduction

Hi Phuong! On 08/03/2017 04:37 AM, Nguyen Viet Phuong wrote > I'm Phuong, I'm an CS student and been using Fedora for over a year. > Now I want to contribute to this project and hopefully improve myself. > My major experience is Web Development, mostly in Python(Django). I'm > really looking

Re: Why is my email address blacklisted?

Hi Scott, Do you have a non @zoho.com email address you can use? ~m On 08/30/2016 03:20 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: We had over 300 zoho.com accounts created in a month that were used to spam the website. At that time there were 0 zoho.com accounts which weren't being used for spam and we

Re: Refresh Photos on GetFedora.org Workstation Website

On Thursday, March 24, 2016 5:54:22 PM EDT, Robert Mayr wrote: If we want to do that we should take these task to Design ASAP, to give them enough time to produce them. Thoughts? https://fedorahosted.org/design-team/ticket/430 :) Happy Easter! ~m -- websites mailing list

Re: Refresh Photos on GetFedora.org Workstation Website

This issue, as with all other issues we deal with on the websites team, will be prioritized accordingly. ~m -- websites mailing list websites@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Refresh Photos on GetFedora.org Workstation Website

The members of the web team can address any issues and have the necessary skills to do so. Thanks for your feedback. On March 22, 2016 6:02:10 PM EDT, Nadim Kobeissi wrote: >Hey Matthew, > >I don't have the necessary skills to remove the white halo. Seeing as >it's already

Re: Replace Terrible Photos on GetFedora.org Workstation Website

t;aspect? All of this is not constructive. Here is a suggestion as to what all of the above should have said: "Where is the website repo?" The rest is unconstructive and ranty. ~m > >Thank you for your response, >Nadim > >From: Mái

Re: Replace Terrible Photos on GetFedora.org Workstation Website

On 03/20/2016 11:06 AM, nadim@nadim.computer wrote: However, what comes after that is the problem: the Workstation has a bunch of sentences that either make very specific technical references or in general contribute little value to selling the project. These could be fixed by focusing on a

Re: What kinds of downloads should we list on a generic / other downloads page?

On 09/17/2015 09:22 AM, Robert Mayr wrote: we could also add the respins [2] of the actual edition images, as they are not official images but people spend a lot of time to make them adding the latest packages and avoiding so the 500-600MB update you need to do when downloading for example the

What kinds of downloads should we list on a generic / other downloads page?

Hi folks, So this idea came up in the netinstall download info thread [1], although I have been thinking offhand for a while it might be a good idea for other reasons (eg enabling testers to find the test images more easily - every time I need to find a test image I can never find it. :) )

Re: Netinstall download info

Hi, On 09/16/2015 09:12 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: Matthew Miller pointed me at this bug: The OP had to drop back to a netinstall when he had a bad experience with the KDE spin. If there are some problems with a spin, certainly the

Re: Netinstall download info

On 09/16/2015 09:44 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: I think I follow you. Do you think it's possible to accomplish this site by drawing from the same site-wide definitions file we use for getfedora.org? I mean, where we define things like the image sizes, etc. It would be awesome to create as

Re: Fedora Developer Portal - UX point of view

Hi Adam, On 09/11/2015 03:54 AM, Adam Samalik wrote: you did a great work, I really appreciate your help. I'm sure the design implementation is completed, so we can work on the dynamic stuff you've pointed out - like blog posts and search box. To implement the header on the page.html template,

Re: Fedora Atomic Web site

Hey I'm going to be at Flock and would love to be involved in the discussion too. ~m On August 11, 2015 3:09:14 PM EDT, Robert Mayr robyd...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Il 10/ago/2015 20:32, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com ha scritto: Hey all, Apologies for all the CC's but this spans a number

Re: [Design-team] new Fedora Atomic sub-site - help wanted

Hi Matthew, On 06/17/2015 08:31 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: This calls for a new, separate http://atomic.fedoraproject.org;. I don't, however, have anyone lined up to design or create the site itself. So, this is a first call for help. :) Is anyone interested / able to work on this? To help

Re: [Design-team] new Fedora Atomic sub-site - help wanted

On 06/17/2015 11:46 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: See https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/96 for some background. The rationale I'm seeing in the links (just to reiterate to make sure I'm getting it right): 1) There are tools that don't work with atomic, so atomic installs need to identify

Re: [proposal] Fedora Developer Portal

Hi Adam! On 05/27/2015 10:57 AM, Adam Samalik wrote: Do you have any tips, recommendations or expectations about this project? Is there something you would like to see on the page? Let's start a discussion! I think this is a really cool idea and sorely needed. I would be happy to assist

Re: Customization to a project's wiki page

Hi Chenxiong, On 12/11/2014 02:37 AM, Chenxiong Qi wrote: I'm a maintainer of Nitrate. Since we already hosted the source code in Github, and are using Issues to maintain all potential bugs. Roadmap, View Tickets and New Tickets in the navigator in wiki page

Re: Feedback on the new website

Hi Oliver, On 12/10/2014 11:32 AM, Oliver Propst wrote: Just noticed that fedora have just launched a new website [1], must say I like the more simplistic theme (guess it will be much easier to get maintain) also its great that its very straight forward to access the download page. I'm glad

Re: Feedback on the new website

On 12/10/2014 03:16 PM, Chaoyi Zha wrote: I have no idea what the page looks on your computers, but I see this: http://i.imgur.com/IVdaQIA.jpg The computer is very blurry and grainy. I've looked at it through many browsers (FF, IE, Opera) and both on my desktop and my laptop. It has the same

Re: Fedora.next website meeting

On 10/01/2014 04:24 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote: Hi everybody, We're going to have a meeting about the Fedora.next website on Tuesday, October 14 at 14:00 Eastern US / 13:00 Central US / 20:00 Paris Rome in #fedora-websites on irc.freenode.net. You are more than welcome to join. I have the meeting set up

Re: ask permission to use one picture on fedora webpage

Hi Camille, On 10/07/2014 11:07 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: Hi Camille. I believe that the intent is for all Fedora artwork (other than that which is covered by trademark) to be licensed for reuse, probably under a Creative Commons license. However, this particular image seems to have been

Fedora.next website meeting

Hi everybody, We're going to have a meeting about the Fedora.next website on Tuesday, October 14 at 14:00 Eastern US / 13:00 Central US / 20:00 Paris Rome in #fedora-websites on irc.freenode.net. You are more than welcome to join. I have the meeting set up in Fedocal; I have added both the

Re: Fedora.next website meeting

Yeh, we can do that... we are all available at 3 too. I'll change the mtg in the cal. Sent from my phone, which is not an iphone. div Original message /divdivFrom: Chaoyi Zha summermontr...@gmail.com /divdivDate:10/01/2014 4:27 PM (GMT-05:00) /divdivTo: Máirín Duffy du

Re: Maybe it's time to say goodbye to start.fedoraproject.org?

On 08/27/2014 10:43 AM, Chaoyi Zha wrote: Looks pretty. I like the design, but perhaps we can make it a little more useful? The blog entries in the middle and some of the other blocks clutter the page quite a bit. Can you make it more minimalistic, so that people will keep it as their

Re: Contributing to web related tasks

Hi Nick! On 04/20/2014 11:45 AM, Nick Germaine wrote: I understand that free software needs contributors to succeed, and so I'm offering my skills up to help out with the websites (I have seen quite a few tickets in there). Woohoo! Thanks for joining in!!! Have you seen any of the

Re: Suggestions (was Re: Fedora project wiki)

Hey Javier, can you help us out too? What timezone are you in? Are you open to a chat? Sent from my phone, which is not an iphone. Original message From: Robert Mayr robyd...@fedoraproject.org Date:11/21/2013 4:28 AM (GMT-05:00) To: Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org

Suggestions (was Re: Fedora project wiki)

Hi websites folks, Sorry for the top-post, it seemed to make more sense to post this particular thing this way. What do you think about Javier's suggestions below? - I agree with the search box on the wiki being hard to find. It should be pretty simple to move it up in the template. I don't

Re: range based voting

On 10/14/2013 08:13 AM, ben van 't ende wrote: Heyla, I am community manager for the TYPO3 project. We are investigating the use of range based voting in our project. I have understood you have used that in your project. Is my info correct? And if so, how have you used it? Just personal

Re: New download pages, brainstorming

On 08/30/2013 03:23 AM, Robert Mayr wrote: But users and contributors necessarily have different goals and thus different tasks, so I'm not sure how/why one site should (or could) serve both? I think contributors are also end-users, we shouldn't separate them strictly. As user and

Re: New download pages, brainstorming

On 08/26/2013 09:52 AM, Robert Mayr wrote: 1) Create a drop-down menu on our main page, where we can also add in the next months other important changes (fedoramagazine, features, etc), to help users to find their desired format or spin faster than now. I'm adding a mockup for this here. [2]

Re: New download pages, brainstorming

2013/8/29 Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org: This is inconsistent with our website chrome and it blocks banner content so I'm not convinced it's the right call. On 08/29/2013 04:59 PM, Robert Mayr wrote: Ok, I see your concern, do we have other possibilities to make our fedoraproject.org

Re: New download pages, brainstorming

On 08/29/2013 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: It's nice to have a brochure site (and I think the one we have is really nice!), but I'd love to have the main landing site for both contributors and users be more active But users and contributors necessarily have different goals and thus

Re: Fedora

Hi Namrata, On 08/19/2013 09:06 AM, namrata mohapatra wrote: I want to install Fedora 18 iso image from , can I use it without burning a DVD . I have a windows system Yes, you can use a USB stick instead. These instructions should walk you through it - there are instructions specifically for

Remembering Seth Vidal on fedoraproject.org

Hi, I think it would be nice thing to have a banner tribute to Seth on the front page of fedoraproject.org. I put together 3 mockups (the same with color variations.) We could set up a page where people can submit their memories of Seth and link to it from the banner. What do you think? Here

Re: about site styling in re usability

On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 19:36 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: On 2012-12-05 18:02 (GMT-0500) Ryan composed: What do you mean exactly by the philosophy of the styling ? If you Is there a statement of purpose for the site, or any guidelines on achieving desired ends? Do accessibility, usability

Re: about site styling in re usability

On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 11:34 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: I guess you missed the chicken and egg point. The site is difficult to use in its current state. I get aggravated by that difficulty constantly on sites I'm forced to use. I'm strongly disinclined to further the aggravation on sites I'm

Re: about site styling in re usability

On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 14:10 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: There are different ways of actually helping. Handicaps are precisely the problem, particularly the totally needless _artificial_ handicaps created by common web site styling. One way of helping is reporting they exist to those who may

Re: about site styling in re usability

Hi Felix! On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 00:44 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: Is there a compelling reason Fedora can't be a leader in web site friendliness as well as distro compilation? Am I the only one involved in the project who thinks following the lead of most of the rest of the web is rude[3]?

Re: Contact of Matthew Garret for Interview

For others on this queue, Matthew has already been contacted. ~m On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 16:59 +0200, Radiofuzzie.com - Jan Raehm wrote: Hi Fedora-Web-Team, I hope you can help me. I need to do an interview with Matthew Garret about UEFI / Secure Boot. Can you get me in contact with

Re: Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 19:50 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: How about 400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better Since we now offer 64bit by default, we need to change this text, we are still trying to figure out what is the earliest 64bit CPU we support. 64-bit

Re: Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:06 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 19:50 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: How about 400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better Since we now offer 64bit by default, we need to change this text, we are still trying to figure

Re: www.fpo front page banners for Fedora 17's release

Hi folks, On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 01:18 +0200, Máirín Duffy wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 16:06 -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote: I would be happy to see AS7 get some love here. Poettering: The Most Awesome, Least-Advertised Fedora 17 Feature http://lwn.net/Articles/495603/ No, Lennart

Re: www.fpo front page banners for Fedora 17's release

On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 16:06 -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote: I would be happy to see AS7 get some love here. Also Poettering: The Most Awesome, Least-Advertised Fedora 17 Feature http://lwn.net/Articles/495603/ No, Lennart is not the feature, it's about multiseat. ~m -- websites mailing list

internet censorship statement for fedoraproject.org front page (was Re: FUDcon Board Meeting)

Hi folks, Regarding adding a statement about SOPA on the front page of fedoraproject.org - On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Kévin Raymond 2. General statement to announce + ticker tape linking to statements til the end of the month on the front page. +7 On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 13:29 +,

Re: Suggestion: Black out fedoraproject.org on the 18th to protest against SOPA and PROTECT-IP

On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 04:19 -0500, Kévin Raymond wrote: I was about to answer the same. We all feel really concerned about the Open Source, of course, but could not interfer with politics. FWIW, Mozilla is participating in the blackout. ~m -- websites mailing list

Re: bullshits!

Hi Charlie, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:55 +0100, charlie wrote: soo.. i have installed fedora 16 64-bit. and now i can to play any movie, because there is no possible to install any codec with ac-3 support. there is no support for this problem on ur website, so please stop to writte this

Re: [fedoracommunity.org] The filler pics didn't fill up the whole box.

On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 21:17 -0600, Sijis Aviles wrote: The box on the left is intentional. I don't believe there was a 'purpose' for it other than look. Keeping up with homepage screenshot is too much effort. I do recall it should change when someone hovers over it though to a darker color.

Re: Choosing slide contents for F17's release - in this mailing list thread

On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 16:06 +0200, Kévin Raymond wrote: 2. Feature slide. Right now it's about gnome 3. before that it was about auto-installing printer drivers. Which f16 feature we should use for this slide? Grub2 ? :) GPT disk label ? A user-friendly one, I don't know GNOME 3.2 is a

Re: Lxde download link

On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 14:14 -0400, Morgan Coombs wrote: Hi, the fedora 15 lxde spin download link is taking too long to respond for me and i really want to try it out. Are you using the torrent? http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/spins/Fedora-15-i686-Live-LXDE.torrent If not, can you provide

Re: Fedora Community

On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 21:53 +, Luke Macken wrote: Personally, I still use fedoracommunity on a regular basis, and find it to be extremely useful in many ways. Right now we do not have any idea as to how many people are using it. I think we should do some log analysis, and maybe a survey to

Re: F15 | Tutorials

On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 13:05 +, Jef van Schendel wrote: 2011/4/22 Elad el...@doom.co.il: No, I was talking about the screenshots in the features page, eg. https://fedoraproject.org/static/images/features/screenshots/networkmanager.png I can help with that. I don't have Mo's original

group photo from a recent event?

Hi Ambassadors, I am wondering if anyone has a group photo of Fedora folks from a recent event? We'd like to update the group photo from FUDcon Zurich that is now up on fedoraproject.org. Let us know - Thanks, ~m -- websites mailing list websites@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No Fedora 14 screenshots?

On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 14:38 -0700, zem...@softhome.net wrote: Hi, I was interested in seeing pictures of Fedora 14 and went to your website at fedoraproject.org and clicked in the link Features Screenshots. I was taken to http://fedoraproject.org/en/features/ but I could not see a

Re: [patch] fedoraproject.org

Hi Bert, On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:17 +0100, Bert Desmet wrote: Hi! I created a patch for the fedoraproject.org main website. I think it's more easy to not have an 'ok' button next to the language selector.. So, I made that if you select a new language, the site loads the new language

Re: figured out the image color issue (FF 3.5 and higher)

On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 17:41 -0600, Ian Weller wrote: http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/06/color-correction/ So, I'm going to write a quick hacky script to check images for those fields, and if they have them, delete them, along with a list of ignores. This'll go in the root of fedora-web.git

Re: Change Contributors to Wiki?

On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 17:54 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 11/01/2010 05:35 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 13:30 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote I think wiki has a lot of useful content for users and we keep adding more. I am not sure it is intended for just contributors

Re: Change Contributors to Wiki?

On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:41 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: What if Contributors went to a specific page on the wiki, such as https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join , and a Wiki link went to the wiki front page? I'm really sorry, but I'm not comfortable with this suggestion at all. As pointed out

Re: Change Contributors to Wiki?

Hi Karsten, On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 17:10 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: Right, that's fine; like Ian, I was mainly pointing out that the wiki[1] is (at least) dual-purpose, so putting a link to it's front-page might come from two different purposes. The reason I put the link in the navbar was

Re: Change Contributors to Wiki?

On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 10:20 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I don't go to the wiki to contribute. I go to the wiki to find out how to do things. What things? Create a FAS account? :) ~m -- websites mailing list websites@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Changing the gray background of the slides

Hi Elad, On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 21:28 +0200, Elad wrote: Hi everyone. As I've said before,i think we should replace the gray background of the slides with a nicer backgrounds. I've created two screenshots with the background I think that should be used instead of the gray.

Re: Go back to the old site, at least for now

Hi, On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 15:40 +0200, Kevin Raymond wrote: Looks fine here under the latest version of Chrome (7.0.517.41) under Windows. Is your Windows Vista, Windows 7, or XP? ~m -- websites mailing list websites@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Go back to the old site, at least for now

On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:56 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 01:23 -0400, Nadim Kobeissi wrote: Dear webmaster, You need to seriously consider reverting to the old website. The new one is buggy, incomplete, disfunctional, and just not well done. The old one was much more

Re: Nice new website, but please fix the css style for the fonts...

Hi Bernardino, http://www.microsoft.com/typography/cleartype/tuner/step1.aspx Can you turn clear type on using the page above and see if that helps? ~m On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:40 -0700, Bernardino Lopez wrote: Please see attached PDF. I recommend to use in the stylesheet helvetica,

Re: Nice new website, but please fix the css style for the fonts...

On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 11:14 -0700, Bernardino Lopez wrote: That is correct, Windows XP . Firefox Portable 3.6.7 Ok, I just try with I.E. 6.0 and can see the fonts look a lot better... Interesting, will try from home with Firefox and see how looks in fedora... perhaps will be good idea to

Re: Nice new website, but please fix the css style for the fonts...

Hi Bernardino, Some Windows XP systems have cleartype turned on by default, some have it turned off. It depends on your system. That would be awesome if you packaged some ruby on rails things for us. :) ~m On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 11:21 -0700, Bernardino Lopez wrote: I can, but wouldn't be

Re: new site fonts

Hi Smooge, On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 13:04 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: What I am finding interesting is that half the people say it looks bad in IE and not firefox and the other half say it is firefox that looks bad and not IE. I wonder what the hinting issues that are causing this. I've

Re: Nice new website, but please fix the css style for the fonts...

Hi Bernardino, Can you be a bit more specific with your bug report? If you could tell us what browser you are using, the version, and send us a screenshot of the issue you're seeing it would be very helpful! Thanks, ~m On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 13:07 -0700, Bernardino Lopez wrote: Nice new

Website bug rundown day 1

Hi folks, Here's the bugs I've seen reported here, on identi.ca, or on IRC. Let me know if you're aware of any others. We should probably set up another wiki page. :) AFAIK only one has a ticket. By the way, thanks to everyone reporting the issues they see. Keep them coming if you've got them -

Countdown banners for www.fpo

Hi folks, Alexander Smirnov from the Fedora Design team has put together the countdown artwork for www.fpo and interfaced with the translators to make sure there's translated versions of them all. All of the files are here: http://inkscaper.fedorapeople.org/Fedora14/countdown-banner/ Thanks, ~m

Re: Fedora website redesign Help page

Hi Jef! On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 15:41 +0200, Jef van Schendel wrote: Ok guys, I've now got this: http://schendje.fedorapeople.org/fedorahelp/helpfpo-redesign-2010_mockup2.png So basically I've added it as a (pretty obvious) sidenote with links to the common bugs, bugzilla itself and the

Re: Fedora website redesign Help page

Hi Jef! On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 15:41 +0200, Jef van Schendel wrote: Hi guys, This morning I've been working on the redesigned Fedora Help page. This is what I've got so far: http://schendje.fedorapeople.org/fedorahelp/helpfpo-redesign-2010_mockup1.png

Re: Introduction and new, exploring contributors

On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 00:52 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote: What tasks do folks need to accomplish? I think that the majority of people coming to the site are going to want to see what Fedora can do, sort of like a showcase of sorts. From there, they should be able to easily download the

Re: [Ambassadors] What do you think? (was Re: fedoracommunity.org portal design)

Hi Gianluca! Thanks for this discussion :) On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 11:32 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote: Fedora (redesigned) 1. go to fedoraproject.org 2. click on Community I guess this will link to fedoracommunity.org) It will, but not directly. There will probably be a banner ad or

Re: start.fedoraproject.org image still shows as Fedora 12 and not 13

On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 22:07 -0500, Ian Weller wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:46:27AM -0400, Mark Schlegel wrote: I noticed that the upper left image shows the Fedora 12 image, shouldn't that be updated to be Fedora 13? The old reference is still in your browser cache; I have confirmed

  1   2   >