Re: Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

2012-05-23 Thread Kévin Raymond
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 20:27 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: > > >> yes, this is why I say the front page should only have the recommended >> specs, not the minimal. > > Ahh okay, so here's the revision: > > Recommended installation requirements: >

Re: Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

2012-05-23 Thread Elad Alfassa
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 20:27 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: > > > > yes, this is why I say the front page should only have the recommended > > specs, not the minimal. > > Ahh okay, so here's the revision: > > Recommended installation requirements:

Re: Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

2012-05-23 Thread Máirín Duffy
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 20:27 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: > yes, this is why I say the front page should only have the recommended > specs, not the minimal. Ahh okay, so here's the revision: Recommended installation requirements: * 64-bit Intel-compatible PC * 1 GB memory (RAM) * 10 GB disk space

Re: Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

2012-05-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 23 May 2012 20:27:10 +0300 Elad Alfassa wrote: > Also, I heard we now require less than 768MB of ram for install, but > if we do recommended, it should be 1GB. The current requirement is 512MB of ram for install. nirik: we verified that 512MB works in lots of tests before lowering it

Re: Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

2012-05-23 Thread Elad Alfassa
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:06 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 19:50 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: > > > > > > > > How about "400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better" > > > > > > Since we now offer 64bit by default, we

Re: Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

2012-05-23 Thread Máirín Duffy
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:06 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 19:50 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: > > > > > How about "400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better" > > > > Since we now offer 64bit by default, we need to change this text, we > > are still tryin

Re: Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

2012-05-23 Thread Máirín Duffy
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 19:50 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: > > How about "400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better" > > Since we now offer 64bit by default, we need to change this text, we > are still trying to figure out what is the earliest 64bit CPU we > support. "64-bit

Re: Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

2012-05-23 Thread Robyn Bergeron
On 05/23/2012 09:50 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Máirín Duffy > wrote: Hi, I noticed some cruft has surfaced on fedoraproject.org 's front page. The Installation requirements section concern

Re: Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

2012-05-23 Thread Elad Alfassa
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed some cruft has surfaced on fedoraproject.org's front page. > The Installation requirements section concerns me most. I've quoted the > current text below and my suggestions for cleaning it up. Are these > suggestions okay? >

Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

2012-05-23 Thread Máirín Duffy
Hi, I noticed some cruft has surfaced on fedoraproject.org's front page. The Installation requirements section concerns me most. I've quoted the current text below and my suggestions for cleaning it up. Are these suggestions okay? --- "400MHz Pentium Pro or better processor (comparable AMD, Cyri