On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:04:57PM -0800, Sriram Natarajan wrote:
> Suhosin is delivered as a separate 'extension' and is not patched within
> the php core. To enable 'suhosin' within PHP, customers using Web Stack
> within Open Solaris Developer Express 01/08 or Open Solaris Developer
> Preview
> I read in
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/problem_statement/
> that t:
> " PKG-3: Software should also be available in meta clusters for people
> to install specific to their needs eg. Web 2.0 meta cluster."
>
> Would meta-cluster feature be in the next Indiana [preview]
Hi,
I read in
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/problem_statement/
that t:
" PKG-3: Software should also be available in meta clusters for people
to install specific to their needs eg. Web 2.0 meta cluster."
Would meta-cluster feature be in the next Indiana [preview] releas
Sriram Natarajan wrote:
> Hi
> Please find the webrev to address the following CR:6658437 , 6659040,
> 6658445. I am hoping to integrate these fixes for build 84. So, your
> comments and feedback are much appreciated
>
> WebRev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sn123202/fixes_for_b84/webrev
>
Loo
>> usr/src/cmd/apache2/apache.build.env:
>> usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWapch22d/prototype_com:
>> usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWapch22u/prototype_i386:
>> usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWapch22u/prototype_sparc:
>> usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWapch22u/prototype_com:
>> (I might've missed some, so check in all changed files)
>>
>>-
Jyri Virkki wrote:
>
>
>> - Include only major and minor version in the package names and choose
>> the package name to be more consistent with the rest of SFW
>> consolidation.. For example, new php package could include only -
>> SUNWphp52usr, SUNWphp52root and SUNWphp52doc. Consolidate S
Hi,
Updated arc draft attached, the changes are:
change these
| > apache_receive_request
| > apache_log_request
| > apache_create_child
| > apache_accept_connection
| > apache_check_user
| > apache_check_access
| > apache_check_authorization
| > dtrace_register_hooks
to the provider names as
Mads Toftum wrote:
>
> Going by http://www.hardened-php.net/suhosin/ there is indeed a patch
> that applies to php - or are you just planning to skip that part and
> only use the extension? (iirc, previously there was no way around the
> patch to php).
There's both a patch and an extension (where
---- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/webstack-discuss/attachments/20080213/9a0b7875/attachment.html>
e 'suhosin' within PHP, customers using Web Stack
within Open Solaris Developer Express 01/08 or Open Solaris Developer
Preview 2 will need to enable this extension by uncommenting
'/etc/php5/5.2.4/conf.d/suhosin.ini'
Hope this helps
thanks
sriram
> Thanks,
> - Ryan
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/webstack-discuss/attachments/20080213/61142054/attachment.html>
Jyri,
Thanks for your code feedback.
I have these files in checked out state (thats why the ident line will
say '%Z%' and such and does not echo the actual version yet). This is a
practice from my old dev team. May be I should checkin before submitting
for review?
I have updated the copyright
Seema
Will it be possible to avoid including the httpd- information
in the patch file. This way, we could use the same patch for future
revisions as well.
Seema Alevoor wrote:
>>> usr/src/cmd/apache2/apache.build.env:
>>> usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWapch22d/prototype_com:
>>> usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWapch22
jean jayet wrote:
> one question, Seema
>
> is the level of integration of 2.2.8 similar with 2.2.6 meaning in
> particular same extensions integrated ?
Yes. Apart from those, 2.2.8 includes one additional module, mod_substitute.
Check http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_substitute.html f
Jyri Virkki wrote:
> Seema Alevoor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review the fix for CR 6653066.
>> WebRev is at http://cr.opensolaris.org/~seema/6653066/
>
> Thanks for testing dependencies like svn..
>
> Maybe also do some testing with a minimal PHP page as well, if you
> haven't already. I don't
Hello!
Please review the code changes for the following CRs as mentioned in the
webrev below. Thanks.
The sparc build does not include DTrace probes because the CR 6659110
causes sparc default (optimized) build to fail. There is a workaround to
have a debug build (-g ONLY) of Ruby with DTrace p
looks ok..
This message posted from opensolaris.org
16 matches
Mail list logo
