Hi Siriam,
Thanks for the feedback.
Sriram Natarajan wrote:
> Hi
> - More appropriate SMF service name would be network/http:lighttpd.
>
Is the point being that I should just add lighttpd as an instance to
network/httpd or is the dropping of the '14' suffix also significant.
What I mean is
as scrubbed...
Name: lighttpd-arc-draft.txt
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/webstack-discuss/attachments/20080229/4f26d3e2/attachment.txt>
Jyri Virkki wrote:
> Sriram Natarajan wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the review. PEAR uses these definition during build time to
>> appropriately create the /etc/php5/5.2.4/pear.conf with these values.
>> Without these definitions, default pear.conf is created which is very
>> build and host specif
Seema Alevoor wrote:
>
> >(This can also help highlight which *.patch files are
> >opensolaris-specific and don't [yet?] correspond to upstream apache
> >bugids.)
>
> Agreed. But, AFAIK, there isn't a bug id corresponding to this patch !
> Hence, the only option was to specify the revision number.
> > - You might want to provide a symbolic link so that users can access
> > lighttpd from /usr/lighttpd/bin like the same way we have done for PHP
> > and MySQL.
>
> What's the logic behind that? Is it mainly to make it easier to get to?
Yes but let's also consider the distinction between
Sriram Natarajan wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review. PEAR uses these definition during build time to
> appropriately create the /etc/php5/5.2.4/pear.conf with these values.
> Without these definitions, default pear.conf is created which is very
> build and host specific. Please note that PEAR_TEMP
Sriram Natarajan wrote:
>
> Long time back, I remember hearing that we do plan to provide a more
> user friendly default welcome file as part of our Apache integration.
> Has there been any update on this ? It would be really useful to get a
> user friendly 'index.html' in time for nevada bui
Prashant
Good question. Frankly, I don't know the right answer. Hope, there is a
mechanism within Open Solaris to provide a install order. Hope, some one
more knowledgeable will be able to add valuable insight on this issue
thanks
sriram
Prashant Srinivasan wrote:
>> t a later date.
>>
>>
>
Arvind
Arvind Srinivasan wrote:
> Sriram Natarajan wrote:
>> Hi
>> I would like to integrate PEAR/PECL support within PHP in Open
>> Solaris. Here with, I would like to address the following bugs. I am
>> hoping to address these issues for Nevada build 85. Can you kindly
>> take a look at th
> t a later date.
>
>
>>> - You might want to provide a symbolic link so that users can access
>>> lighttpd from /usr/lighttpd/bin like the same way we have done for PHP
>>> and MySQL.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> What's the logic behind that? Is it mainly to make it easier to get to?
>> W
Jyri Virkki wrote:
> Seema Alevoor wrote:
>> Done. I have removed README.solaris and updated the apache2 manpage.
>> New webrevs are at http://cr.opensolaris.org/~seema/6653084-6634416/ .
>
> Looks ok, just a detail:
>
> apache2.1m.sunman:
>
> +When the \fB/usr\fR is mounted as read-only, you
Amanda waite wrote:
> Hi Siriam,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Sriram Natarajan wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> - More appropriate SMF service name would be network/http:lighttpd.
>>
>>
> Is the point being that I should just add lighttpd as an instance to
> network/httpd or is the dropping of
John Plocher wrote:
> Have you looked at how debian does this?
>
> IIRC, they have a whole dir structure that deals with sites, configs and
> modules
> that is managed with symlinks rather than editing config files...
One does not have to always edit the config file. Editing is needed only whe
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/webstack-discuss/attachments/20080229/d3292081/attachment.html>
Hi
Going forward, I would like to propose changing the default location
of our PHP5 modules or extensions from /usr/php5/modules to
/var/php5/modules. I was wondering if I can hear your feed back on this
change before I include this issue in the next ARC case. Also, if there
is a way to be
Sriram Natarajan wrote:
> HI
> Long time back, I remember hearing that we do plan to provide a more
> user friendly default welcome file as part of our Apache integration.
> Has there been any update on this ? It would be really useful to get a
> user friendly 'index.html' in time for nevada
Hi
- More appropriate SMF service name would be network/http:lighttpd.
- You might want to provide a symbolic link so that users can access
lighttpd from /usr/lighttpd/bin like the same way we have done for PHP
and MySQL.
- man page also need to reside under /usr/share/man/.. in the same way
HI
Long time back, I remember hearing that we do plan to provide a more
user friendly default welcome file as part of our Apache integration.
Has there been any update on this ? It would be really useful to get a
user friendly 'index.html' in time for nevada build 86.
thanks
sriram
Jyri Virkki wrote:
> Seema Alevoor wrote:
>> Recently, segv was observed in 2.2.8 which was caused by one of the
>> apr-util changes which went in 2.2.8.
>> A patch has already been committed to apr-util trunk as r630780.
>> I made the changes to include this patch in our apache2 build.
>>
>> Upd
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/webstack-discuss/attachments/20080229/8c36123a/attachment.html>
20 matches
Mail list logo
