[webstack-discuss] webrev needed for upgrading memcached 1.2.5 to 1.4.1

2009-09-29 Thread Trond Norbye
Chris Josephes wrote: > Most people don't run memcached on a privileged port, but even if they wanted > to, the following method_context block in the manifest would accommodate that. > > > privileges='basic,!proc_session,!proc_info,!file_link

[webstack-discuss] webrev needed for upgrading memcached 1.2.5 to 1.4.1

2009-09-29 Thread Trond Norbye
Matt Ingenthron wrote: > Trond Norbye wrote: >> See: >> >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~trond/webrev/ > > From the peanut gallery > > It generally looks good. I like the change to the default user of > noaccess. > > Having said that, I'd highly recommend adding some default options, > say "-L

[webstack-discuss] webrev needed for upgrading memcached 1.2.5 to 1.4.1

2009-09-29 Thread Trond Norbye
Chris Josephes wrote: > Actually, I don't understand why you're setting up memcache to run as a user > through the "-u" flag to the daemon. > > If you use a block, you accomplish the same thing, > only more securely. Also it's easier for an administrator to change which > user

[webstack-discuss] update php to 5.2.10 within opensolaris

2009-09-29 Thread Seema Alevoor
Makefile.sfw : * "--with-libxml-dir" configure option is listed twice. * "--with-libexpat-dir" option is missing. Is it not required ? SUNWphp52r-pear/prototype_com : * revision version looks incorrect. Previous one is 1.2 whereas the latest one is 1.4 * Should we preserve the fil

[webstack-discuss] webrev needed for upgrading memcached 1.2.5 to 1.4.1

2009-09-29 Thread Chris Josephes
>To be serious, yes things could be done a bit differently but this >solution requires the least architectural review and meets user needs >without being too complicated. How does this change affect or add time to the architectural review? Would it make sense for me to submit a proposal for a fu

[webstack-discuss] webrev needed for upgrading memcached 1.2.5 to 1.4.1

2009-09-29 Thread Chris Josephes
Most people don't run memcached on a privileged port, but even if they wanted to, the following method_context block in the manifest would accommodate that.

[webstack-discuss] Looking for DBD::MySQL Perl module

2009-09-29 Thread Eric Reid - Sun ISV Engineering
In the 'Old /pending' days, RoboPorter placed a slew of PM modules into /pending. In the new world, I don't see most of these in the current /pending and /contrib repos. Specifically, I'm looking for the MySQL DBD module for use with DBI, but not seeing it anywhere. SUNWpmdbi is in /release, as

[webstack-discuss] update php to 5.2.10 within opensolaris

2009-09-29 Thread Sriram Natarajan
Seema thanks for looking into this. Seema Alevoor wrote: > Makefile.sfw : > * "--with-libxml-dir" configure option is listed twice. > * "--with-libexpat-dir" option is missing. Is it not required ? we are going to use libxml for php's xml needs. dependency on libexpat should no longer be req

[webstack-discuss] update php to 5.2.10 within opensolaris

2009-09-29 Thread rahul
> Hi > Since my initial post, PHP 5.2.11 has been released and I would like to > integrate PHP 5.2.11 within OpenSolaris build 126 . Can you kindly > review the below webrev > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sn123202/php5211.1/webrev/ > > This webrev includes following bug fixes > > - Upgrade php

[webstack-discuss] webrev needed for upgrading memcached 1.2.5 to 1.4.1

2009-09-29 Thread Chris Josephes
Actually, I don't understand why you're setting up memcache to run as a user through the "-u" flag to the daemon. If you use a block, you accomplish the same thing, only more securely. Also it's easier for an administrator to change which user account they would prefer to run