Lars Heill wrote, On 12/ 2/09 05:56 PM:
> Lars Heill wrote, On 12/ 1/09 03:03 PM:
>> sunanda menon wrote, On 12/ 1/09 08:16 AM:
>>> Darryl Gove wrote:
>>>> sunanda menon wrote:
>>>>> Pete Dennis wrote:
>>>>>> So the change looks o
Jeff Trawick wrote, On 11/30/09 04:42 PM:
> sunanda menon wrote:
>> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>> sunanda menon wrote:
Please review the changes made at
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sunandam/6857014/ and let me know your
>>>
>>> Is there a separate CR covering the cflags change from -x04 to -x
Lars Heill wrote, On 12/ 1/09 03:03 PM:
> sunanda menon wrote, On 12/ 1/09 08:16 AM:
>> Darryl Gove wrote:
>>> sunanda menon wrote:
>>>> Pete Dennis wrote:
>>>>> So the change looks okay to me in that you are just reducing the
>>>>> op
sunanda menon wrote, On 12/ 1/09 08:16 AM:
> Darryl Gove wrote:
>> sunanda menon wrote:
>>> Pete Dennis wrote:
So the change looks okay to me in that you are just reducing the
optimization levels.
I would like to see follow up bugs logged so that the reason why
the optimiza
Philip Antoniades wrote, On 03/13/09 08:20 PM:
> Hi,
>
> Is the process/schedule for new MySQL builds documented? I'm trying to
> weigh the best source for binaries (vs dev.mysql.com s10 pkg files).
5.0.77 contains a security fix and will go in soon.
5.1.30 is going into OpenSolaris as I type.
Sriram Natarajan wrote:
>>> Are we going to integrate latest MySQL release - MySQL 5.0.77 within
>>> OpenSolaris / Solaris 10 (as part of Web Stack 1.5) ?
>>
>> 5.1.30 is targeted for b110, no plans for 5.0.77.
> Will 1.5 customer not wonder as why we didn't deliver 5.0.77 ?
5.0.77 was released
Sriram Natarajan wrote:
> Hi
> Are we going to integrate latest MySQL release - MySQL 5.0.77 within
> OpenSolaris / Solaris 10 (as part of Web Stack 1.5) ?
5.1.30 is targeted for b110, no plans for 5.0.77.
-- Lars
Jyri Virkki wrote, On 02/20/09 08:18 AM:
>
> Surely there was an OSR for MySQL, no?
Inbound OSRs are not needed for MySQL as confirmed by legal in October 2008:
Going forward, you should just make sure to include any MySQL
code/components in the "other included Sun technologies"
Hi all,
We would appreciate comments on this ARC case as soon as possible,
would like to reach build 105.
Thanks,
Lars
sunanda menon wrote, On 11/19/08 11:53 AM:
> Based on the comments received sometime in Aug 2008 ,the ARC case is on
> review at
> http://wikis.sun.com/display/WebStack/MySQL+
Hi Martin,
Thanks for reviewing!
Comments inlined.
Have a nice weekend,
Lars
Martin MC Brown wrote, On 11/21/08 05:22 PM:
> Hi Sunanda!
>
> Few questions:
>
> 1) I believe we still haven't finalized the links or installation for
> default locations (like adding a link between /usr/bin/mysq
sunanda menon wrote, On 11/19/08 11:53 AM:
> Based on the comments received sometime in Aug 2008 ,the ARC case is on
> review at
> http://wikis.sun.com/display/WebStack/MySQL+51ArcCase.
> This Integration was on hold as the MySQL 5.1 GA was not ready .We are
> now coming close to the GA date.
>
Lars Heill wrote, On 08/26/08 12:10 PM:
> FYI:
>
> We have been informed that MySQL 5.1 will not go GA in time
> for build 100 in September. Looking into 5.0.67 now.
Plan of action up to build 100 is now:
1) No separate package for the client libraries at this point.
We shall
FYI:
We have been informed that MySQL 5.1 will not go GA in time
for build 100 in September. Looking into 5.0.67 now.
-- Lars
A last call for comments/review of MySQL 5.1 ARC draft...
Thanks,
Lars
Sunanda Menon wrote, On 08/13/08 11:34 AM:
> We would like to go ahead and submit the ARC case ,so please send in any
> comments you have by Friday 15th Aug (EOB)
>
> Thanks Sunanda
>
> Sunanda Menon wrote:
>> Hi ,
>>
>> I
Peter Tribble wrote, On 08/10/08 08:52 PM:
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Martin MC Brown wrote:
>
> Why de-integrate at all? The advantage of having something like IPS is
> that you can simply have all the versions in the repository and the user can
> choose the one they want.
>
> And given
Lars Heill wrote, On 08/ 8/08 03:33 PM:
>
> We intend to remove 5.0. However, with the jungle of dependants
> out there, not at the same time we add 5.1, but after say two
> months.
http://monaco.sfbay/detail.jsf?cr=6735397 created with a
tentative guesstimated target of build 105
Jyri Virkki wrote, On 08/ 8/08 05:15 AM:
> On Aug 7, 2008, at 7:42 AM, Lars Heill wrote:
>
>> ARC draft has been out for review since July 24:
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/webstack-discuss/2008-July/002209.html
>> It addresses coexistence between 5.0 and 5.1
Jyri Virkki wrote, On 08/ 6/08 11:06 PM:
> On Aug 5, 2008, at 1:17 AM, Sunanda Menon wrote:
>> The Code Changes can be found at
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sunandam/6711903/ and the draft ARC case is
>
> The main question is why are you considering adding 5.1 in
> addition to 5.0 instead of repl
No plans to up-rev MySQL 5.0 since 5.1 is coming soon.
-- Lars
Sriram Natarajan wrote, On 08/ 8/08 07:14 AM:
> Hi
> Currently, I see that MySQL 5.0.67 - latest maintenance release in 5.0
> release train is available for download . Is there any plan to
> integrate this latest maintenance rele
Seema Alevoor wrote, On 08/ 8/08 08:31 AM:
>
> Sriram Natarajan wrote:
>>
>> Seema Alevoor wrote:
>>> I was wondering if the package names of the components like APR-util,
>>> PHP, which provide drivers/extensions to the databases,
>>> should include the database version info ?
>>> e.g, SUNWapu1
Right - after all it is just software and anything is possible :)
We don't even need to all agree as long as the packaging framework
supports it (without breaking existing functionality, of course)
for those that want to use it :) It would be nice if everybody
adapted the same practice, though, b
Sriram Natarajan wrote:
>
> Lars Heill wrote:
>> At that time we did not believe we would have the time/resources to make
>> the changes, but we will scope the effort and have a go now since the ARC
>> is not in an approved state yet and, as Jyri noted, it will be less
>
ARC draft has been out for review since July 24:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/webstack-discuss/2008-July/002209.html
It addresses coexistence between 5.0 and 5.1: Simply put: you should be
able to add/run 5.1 while existing 5.0 server instances are not affected.
See also my comment on pkg-
Lars Heill wrote, On 07/23/08 01:18 PM:
> (did this myself for Java DB, which in SVR4, RPM
> etc form was already split like this, btw, but not picked up by the
> automagical translation into IPS (at least back then))
Actually, this was the other way around: multiple packages
collapsed
See also "Re: [pkg-discuss] Coexistence of MySQL version 5.0 and 5.1"
over on pkg-discuss at opensolaris.org.
-- Lars
Matt.Ingenthron at Sun.COM wrote, On 07/22/08 08:28 PM:
> Jyri Virkki wrote:
>> Sunanda Menon wrote:
>>
>>> How should these symbolic links be customarily handled?
>>>
Matt Ingenthron wrote, On 07/23/08 07:46 AM:
> Hi Jyri,
>
> Jyri Virkki wrote:
>> I've been playing with phpmyadmin package again a bit and one
>> unfortunate detail is that it's not possible to install it without
>> installing all of MySQL5 on localhost, even if one wanted to use it
>> to admini
Jyri Virkki wrote:
> Lars Heill wrote:
>>> request targeting a release. It appears to be CR 6711903 and is
>>> targeting build 98.
>> Right, we hope to have 5.1 in by late September.
>
> b98 is Sept.2. If it has moved to late September please adjust, but keep
Matt.Ingenthron at Sun.COM wrote:
> Hi Jenny!
>
> Luojia Chen wrote:
>> Which version of opensolaris bundled with MySQL 5.0.45?
>> What is the version of MySQL bundled with the latest opensolaris?
>>
>
> One of the good things about IPS is that it will tell you what it's
> serving up just fro
Jyri Virkki wrote, On 06/ 7/08 03:21 AM:
> Sunanda Menon wrote:
>> Hi ,
>>
>> Please code review 6685945:check_deps issues in SUNWmysql5test at
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sunandam/6685945
>> and let me know your comments .
>
> Diff seems ok to me, but the CR evaluation is not complete. Right n
Hi,
Small change, look fine.
Comment/eval in CR not up to date, it seems.
-- Lars
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Ritu Kamboj wrote, On 10/23/07 01:03:
>>>
>> You say that multiple versions of mysql can exist on the system at the same
>> time, and the versioning in /usr/mysql supports that. But you don't have
>> any versioning in /etc/mysql or /var/mysql. Are multiple versions expected
>> to share those dire
Ritu Kamboj wrote:
> Jan S Berg wrote:
>
>> Jyri Virkki wrote:
>>
>>> Ritu Kamboj wrote:
>>>
The mysql-test directory exist in a typical MySQL release area.
I would recommend that we merge the contents of mysql-test to
SUNWmysql5usr package.
>>> I'm still curious to k
32 matches
Mail list logo
