Igor Galic wrote:
>
>
> Those are only a few of the examples, I hope they clarify in which
> direction I was heading.
[Sorry, snipped examples for brevity, if reading via archived check
previous post for details.]
The important bit is that the OpenSolaris Web Stack project does not
fork the upst
(Ouch, this bounced; retrying)
Igor Galic wrote:
> Those are only a few of the examples, I hope they clarify in which direction
> I was heading.
You have some points that make good sense. But ...
Most of this comes from upstream. It makes sense for Sun to
stick as close as possible to how up
> While better out-of-the-box behavior and defaults is
> an ongoing
> improvement process, if you have concrete examples to
> share that would
> be helpful as well.
Here is a wonderful example summing up pretty much waht's wrong:
Options FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
Order deny,al
Igor Galic wrote:
>
> I'm using, as niq suggested, this place to form my confused thoughts
> to incoherent babbling, before considering to put it on the public
> mailing ist.
This is a public mailing list ;-)
> The (wish?) list of modules you have included is quite complete, and
> leaves hardly a
I'm using, as niq suggested, this place to form my confused thoughts to
incoherent babbling, before considering to put it on the public mailing ist.
The (wish?) list of modules you have included is quite complete, and leaves
hardly anything to be desired on that end.
What I am missing however a
Following up on yesterday's telecon, we should take note that
a release of the HTTPD trunk, to be labelled 2.3.0 and considered
the first of a series that will eventually become the next
stable release 2.4.
This is therefore a good time to review what we'd like to
see in a new Apache release.
A m
