Amanda Waite wrote:
>
> >The best way forward is to get the new OpenLDAP case (and delivery)
> >done and then lighttpd can simply import it (and we can revive the APR
> >case as well to get APR using OpenLDAP).
>
> The Interface Taxonomy says: "Sun products should consider Volatile
> interfaces a
Jyri Virkki wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> Amanda Waite wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I just read:
>>>
>>> "Sun products should consider Volatile interfaces as equivalent to
>>> Consolidation Private. A contract is required for use of these
>>> interfaces outside of the supplying consolidation"
>>
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> Amanda Waite wrote:
> >Ok, I just read:
> >
> >"Sun products should consider Volatile interfaces as equivalent to
> >Consolidation Private. A contract is required for use of these
> >interfaces outside of the supplying consolidation"
> >
> >In the Interface Taxonomy spec.
Ok, I just read:
"Sun products should consider Volatile interfaces as equivalent to
Consolidation Private. A contract is required for use of these
interfaces outside of the supplying consolidation"
In the Interface Taxonomy spec. I didn't expect it to be documented so
didn't look, silly me.
A
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Amanda Waite wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I see that OpenLDAP in SFW has an interface stability of volatile. As
>> I plan to have Lighttpd consume the OpenLDAP interfaces I would guess
>> that I need to have an agreement in place with the OpenLDAP owners
>> (as per OpenSSL). H
Hi there,
I see that OpenLDAP in SFW has an interface stability of volatile. As I
plan to have Lighttpd consume the OpenLDAP interfaces I would guess that
I need to have an agreement in place with the OpenLDAP owners (as per
OpenSSL). Has anyone else had to tackle this? If so do you know who I
Amanda Waite wrote:
> Ok, I just read:
>
> "Sun products should consider Volatile interfaces as equivalent to
> Consolidation Private. A contract is required for use of these
> interfaces outside of the supplying consolidation"
>
> In the Interface Taxonomy spec. I didn't expect it to be document
Amanda Waite wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I see that OpenLDAP in SFW has an interface stability of volatile. As
> I plan to have Lighttpd consume the OpenLDAP interfaces I would guess
> that I need to have an agreement in place with the OpenLDAP owners (as
> per OpenSSL). Has anyone else had to tackle
