just a quick note:
I've updated a few things in that package. If you're
testing or reviewing it please download a new version from
http://calrudd.com/Webware-experimental_redesign.tar.gz
___
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.so
The errors with cookies and redirect seem to come up fairly
consistently. Maybe webware should print a warning when both the
location and cookie headers are set, or whatever the circumstances
that cause this (maybe just for temporary redirect?)
Ian
> Geoff wrote:
> >- Many of the differences in your design sound very similar
> >to the multi-app stuff that Jay has been working on.
>
> I haven't looked closely at Jay's implementation, but many
> the design ideas are the same. If we go ahead with
> finishing this refactoring off it woul
Drew,
STML looks interesting! There's some ideas in there that
would benefit Cheetah (www.cheetahtemplate.org) and
probably vice versa. It'll be interesting to get STML
running with Webware as well. You should ask Chuck to add
a link to it on his 'Templates Summary' page:
http://webware.sou
Geoff wrote:
>- Many of the differences in your design sound very similar
>to the multi-app stuff that Jay has been working on.
I haven't looked closely at Jay's implementation, but many
the design ideas are the same. If we go ahead with
finishing this refactoring off it would be great to go
One of the discussions mentioned sending a HUP signal to AppServer.
This would be a big improvement over stopping and restarting AppServer.
Especially with the problems restarting AppServer on FreeBSD. Would it
be hard to do?
___
Webware-devel mailing
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:37:39AM -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Drew Csillag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Another thing for SkunkWeb performance. You want to turn off
> > userModuleCleanup. If on, it clears out any modules that were loaded
> > during the course of processing the request, which
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 12:29:17PM -0400, Drew Csillag wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 04:15:20PM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
> > Drew Csillag wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:41:08AM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
> > > > Tavis Rudd wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > All of this is true, but th
Drew Csillag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another thing for SkunkWeb performance. You want to turn off
> userModuleCleanup. If on, it clears out any modules that were loaded
> during the course of processing the request, which in a development
> environment is what you want since you don't want
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 04:15:20PM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
> Drew Csillag wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:41:08AM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
> > > Tavis Rudd wrote:
> > >
> > > > All of this is true, but the final statement is unproven.
> > > > There are many factors involved and r
The redesign is not really of the AppServers. It's Application that is the
big difference. Any speed increase comes from that.
As such, we need to go through Application and review all of the
differences. What I would really like to do is go through all the
chanages/diffs and see if they mak
At 02:40 PM 8/26/01 -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
>I've been quietly working away an experimental redesign and
>repackaging of Webware. It is not a 'rewrite' of Webware.
>Chuck, Geoff, Jay, and the other Webware developers have
>done some excellent work with the existing Webware. Most of
>the code in
Drew Csillag wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:41:08AM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
> > Tavis Rudd wrote:
> >
> > > All of this is true, but the final statement is unproven.
> > > There are many factors involved and realistic benchmarks
> > > are needed before such a statement can be made.
> >
Tavis Rudd wrote:
> I've been quietly working away an experimental redesign and
> repackaging of Webware. It is not a 'rewrite' of Webware.
> Chuck, Geoff, Jay, and the other Webware developers have
> done some excellent work with the existing Webware. Most of
> the code in this redesign is thei
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:41:08AM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
> Tavis Rudd wrote:
>
> > All of this is true, but the final statement is unproven.
> > There are many factors involved and realistic benchmarks
> > are needed before such a statement can be made.
>
> I did some Apache benchmarks (w
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 08:20:09PM -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Tavis Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 3) You write:
> > "WebWare uses a threaded model. While in some ways makes
> > things simpler, it makes many things more complicated.
> > Also, because of the Python global interpreter lock,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 05:52:18PM -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> Hi,
> I was just reading through the Skunkweb FAQ and noticed a
> few statements about Webware that aren't correct:
>
> 1) You write that "WebWare uses PSP as it's sole templating
> language". Webware is being used with several oth
Tavis Rudd wrote:
> All of this is true, but the final statement is unproven.
> There are many factors involved and realistic benchmarks
> are needed before such a statement can be made.
I did some Apache benchmarks (with ab) with more ore less static pages.
Webware was much faster than SkunkWe
18 matches
Mail list logo
