On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 23:43, Edmund Lian wrote:
> While working working with FunFormKit 0.4, I've been finding and fixing
> bugs. Up until now, I've been creating a separate diff for each bug fixed.
> But now, I've got so many fixes that it's a real bear to edit out the
> portions of a diff that do
Patches item #654368, was opened at 2002-12-15 23:26
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304866&aid=654368&group_id=4866
Category: WebKit
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edmund Lian (elian)
Assigned to: Stuart Donald
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 00:02, Stuart Donaldson wrote:
> If a developer is going to take on one of the bugs or patches to review
> and update into CVS, I suggest that they assign the bug to themselves
> first. This lets everyone know that they are the owner of the issue for
> the time being.
Sou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 09:40 pm, you wrote:
> Eh, you can submit it to SF, but I just put it in, so no need.
Great =)
By the way... the project I was working on that helped me find the bug can be
found at:
http://webware.colorstudy.net/twiki/bi
So I would like to suggest a protocol for addressing the bug fixes and
patches that are listed on the sourceforge site.
If a developer is going to take on one of the bugs or patches to review
and update into CVS, I suggest that they assign the bug to themselves
first. This lets everyone know t
Patches item #654368, was opened at 2002-12-15 23:26
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304866&aid=654368&group_id=4866
Category: WebKit
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edmund Lian (elian)
Assigned to: Stuart Donal
Patches item #654361, was opened at 2002-12-15 22:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304866&aid=654361&group_id=4866
Category: WebKit
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edmund Lian (elian)
Assigned to: Stuart Donal
While working working with FunFormKit 0.4, I've been finding and fixing
bugs. Up until now, I've been creating a separate diff for each bug fixed.
But now, I've got so many fixes that it's a real bear to edit out the
portions of a diff that don't relate to the specific bug being fixed. So
now I'm
Patches item #660508, was opened at 2002-12-31 14:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304866&aid=660508&group_id=4866
Category: WebKit
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody
Eh, you can submit it to SF, but I just put it in, so no need.
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 22:29, Luke Holden wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > def awake(self.trans):
> > for baseclass in self.__class__.__bases__
> > if ... (code to check if the method exists?):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> def awake(self.trans):
> for baseclass in self.__class__.__bases__
> if ... (code to check if the method exists?):
> baseclass.awake(self, trans)
> break
> self.initPSP()
>
> This should should hopefully make c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> It's kind of lame, but SecureMixIn could have a method:
>
> def awake(self, trans):
> SiteLayout.awake(self, trans)
Yuck =) That goes against the idea of mixins...
if I where to use this mixin with say... SubSiteLayout ... ah well you g
Well, it's right there in the Python:
def awake(self,trans):
self.__class__.__bases__[0].awake(self, trans)
self.initPSP()
That looks like it's basically just to put in that .initPSP() hook.
It's kind of lame, but SecureMixIn could have a method:
def awake(self, trans)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Can you attach the Python that's generated from the PSP page? It
> probably will be more clear from that. I think that module should be in
> WebKit/Cache/PSP/
Ah yes... that might help wouldn't it =)
BTW... the stuff Im working on right now is fo
Can you attach the Python that's generated from the PSP page? It
probably will be more clear from that. I think that module should be in
WebKit/Cache/PSP/
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 20:06, Luke Holden wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> There seems to be a bug when trying to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 06:06 pm, Luke Holden wrote:
> There seems to be a bug when trying to use mixins and PSP...
I would assume this would prevent the FormKit mixin from working with PSP
pages too.
BTW.. I am using a checkout of Webware from C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There seems to be a bug when trying to use mixins and PSP...
For example...
I have some layout classes... BaseLayout, which overwrites writeHTML... it
calls preLayout, writes some VERY basic html.. calls writeHTMLBody, then
calls postLayout.
SiteL
Patches item #654361, was opened at 2002-12-15 20:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304866&aid=654361&group_id=4866
Category: WebKit
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edmund Lian (elian)
>Assigned to: Stuart Donalds
Patches item #654368, was opened at 2002-12-15 21:26
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304866&aid=654368&group_id=4866
Category: WebKit
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edmund Lian (elian)
>Assigned to: Stuart Donalds
Patches item #630505, was opened at 2002-10-29 06:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304866&aid=630505&group_id=4866
Category: WebKit
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Oleg Noga (oleg_noga)
>Assigned to: Stuart Donal
Edmund Lian wrote:
> On 01/07/2003 11:27:22 AM Geoff wrote:
>
> >Thanks for all the work on bugs and patches. It's much appreciated.
>
> Speaking of which... what is the process by which bugs and patches are
> either accepted or rejected? I see a whole bunch of them in
> the SourceForge
> bug/p
On 01/07/2003 11:27:22 AM Geoff wrote:
>Thanks for all the work on bugs and patches. It's much appreciated.
Speaking of which... what is the process by which bugs and patches are
either accepted or rejected? I see a whole bunch of them in the SourceForge
bug/patch list, but don't know which one
Stuart Donaldson wrote:
> > I wouldn't want < % to be allowed. That just looks weird.
>
> Agree, and neither should "< psp:..." be allowed.
>
> I am trying to nock off bugs and patches. Unless anyone else
> pipes in with
> more comments on this, I would like to just fix the
> documentation, a
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 22:59, Ian Bicking wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 22:18, Stuart Donaldson wrote:
> > I lean towards fixing the example in the docs. Some of the
> code looks
> > like XML, in particular the and
> commands.
> > I would argue that if they look that much like XML then the
24 matches
Mail list logo
