On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 09:37, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
> > What is meant by NonPersistentMemory?
> > Are we talking about when the app server shutsdown and restarts?
> > I had a problem where when I restarted the app server I did not want
> > the old sessions, so I added like to clean the seesion fol
I haven't looked into any load balancing issues myself, just curious,
how are you doing this, and with which adapter? Are you running
multiple AppServers on a single system? Or directing them off to
different systems in the adapter? Or using Apache for this?
-Stuart-
Originally I used the W
Aaron Held wrote:
If someone wants to propose a NonPersistentMemory store as an
experimental feature, I could see including it. But I want to
release 0.8b2 on Wednesday, and I would like ot to be a final beta
prior to release.
What is meant by NonPersistentMemory?
Are we talking about when
Aaron Held [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > If someone wants to propose a NonPersistentMemory store as an
> > experimental feature, I could see including it. But I want
> > to release
> > 0.8b2 on Wednesday, and I would like ot to be a final beta
> prior to release.
>
> What is meant by
If someone wants to propose a NonPersistentMemory store as an
experimental feature, I could see including it. But I want to release
0.8b2 on Wednesday, and I would like ot to be a final beta prior to release.
What is meant by NonPersistentMemory?
Are we talking about when the app server shutsdo
Ian Bicking wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 20:29, Stuart Donaldson wrote:
** Regarding the SessionMemoryStore and saving to disk. **
It appears unlikely from the e-mail thread that many people are using
the SessionMemoryStore relying on the save to disk behavior. The
direction I
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 20:29, Stuart Donaldson wrote:
> ** Regarding the SessionMemoryStore and saving to disk. **
>
> It appears unlikely from the e-mail thread that many people are using
> the SessionMemoryStore relying on the save to disk behavior. The
> direction I think we are leaning is to
I am trying to stick to the plan outlined a couple weeks ago on the 0.8
release. The goal being to get the mostly stable current development
version in CVS released as 0.8 in the near future.
There are a couple of recent issues that I wanted to touch on.
** Regarding the Page.writeDocType()
