I think an Experimental directory is a great idea. It'll save us the
trouble of sending highly experimental versions of various things over
email, etc.
Let's do that.
Jay
Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> At 09:40 PM 5/31/2001 -0400, Jay Love wrote:
>
>> But, I can also maintain it locally just a
At 09:40 PM 5/31/2001 -0400, Jay Love wrote:
>But, I can also maintain it locally just as easily, as I am the only one
>with an interest in it. :)
My only concern is the number of users that will attempt to use it and have
issues, report problems, etc. As a Webware developer, I don't want to be
he need for
it now, that may change in the future.
But, I can also maintain it locally just as easily, as I am the only one
with an interest in it. :)
Jay
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Esterbrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29,
0, 2001 1:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Webware-devel] async
> On the HTTPServer thread... wouldn't it be easiest to make a
> HTTPServerAdapter? Or would this imply a speed hit for the socket
> connection that was the point of using the embedded HTTP server in the
> first place?
&
Tavis Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 May 2001 11:50, Ian Bicking wrote:
> > OTOH, something like FastCGI could perhaps be implemented
> > directly in the AppServer, which would probably speed it
> > up considerably.
>
> hmmm, interesting thought. So you'd use mod_fastcgi to co
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 11:50, Ian Bicking wrote:
> OTOH, something like FastCGI could perhaps be implemented
> directly in the AppServer, which would probably speed it
> up considerably.
hmmm, interesting thought. So you'd use mod_fastcgi to connect
to the AppServer? I don't think it would be
At 01:50 PM 5/30/01 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
>Geoff Talvola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, there already is an HTTPServerAdapter -- it's called Apache +
> > mod_webkit :-)
> >
> > I think of HTTPServer as something you would use if you wanted to embed an
> > HTTP server into another applicat
Geoff Talvola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, there already is an HTTPServerAdapter -- it's called Apache +
> mod_webkit :-)
>
> I think of HTTPServer as something you would use if you wanted to embed an
> HTTP server into another application to provide a web-based interface to
> that applic
At 12:53 AM 5/30/01 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
>On the HTTPServer thread... wouldn't it be easiest to make a
>HTTPServerAdapter? Or would this imply a speed hit for the socket
>connection that was the point of using the embedded HTTP server in the
>first place?
Yes, there already is an HTTPServer
On the HTTPServer thread... wouldn't it be easiest to make a
HTTPServerAdapter? Or would this imply a speed hit for the socket
connection that was the point of using the embedded HTTP server in the
first place?
Also, eventually there *is* going to be a FTPServerAdapter... if
someone else doesn't
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 09:16, Geoff Talvola wrote:
> I'll bet some of the problems in AsyncThreadedHTTPServer
> would be easier to fix using ThreadedAppServer as the
> base instead of Async, just because it's simpler. It'll
> just take somebody's time to do the rewrite.
There's a very simple ver
At 12:38 PM 5/29/01 -0400, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
>At 12:16 PM 5/29/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>>I'll bet some of the problems in AsyncThreadedHTTPServer would be easier
>>to fix using ThreadedAppServer as the base instead of Async, just because
>>it's simpler. It'll just take somebody's
At 12:16 PM 5/29/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>I'll bet some of the problems in AsyncThreadedHTTPServer would be easier
>to fix using ThreadedAppServer as the base instead of Async, just because
>it's simpler. It'll just take somebody's time to do the rewrite.
[snip]
>No objection, just
At 11:26 AM 5/29/01 -0400, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
>At 08:20 AM 5/29/2001 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
>>But AsyncThreadedHTTPServer is also "experimental" and has its own
>>problems. (Remember how it timed out whenever I tried to log in to a
>>protected page?) So why not just give AsyncThreadedAppSer
At 08:20 AM 5/29/2001 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
>But AsyncThreadedHTTPServer is also "experimental" and has its own
>problems. (Remember how it timed out whenever I tried to log in to a
>protected page?) So why not just give AsyncThreadedAppServer the
>same status? Then just change the AppServer s
15 matches
Mail list logo
