RE: [Webware-devel] Xitame adapter

2002-10-01 Thread Geoffrey Talvola
How about an "Adapters" subdirectory under WebKit? We could move the existing adapters like WebKit.cgi, OneShot.cgi, etc. there too. - Geoff > -Original Message- > From: Ian Bicking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 11:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

Re: [Webware-devel] Xitame adapter

2002-09-30 Thread Ian Bicking
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 22:48, Edmund Lian wrote: > What are the pros and cons of Xitame vs Apache with Webware? I only became > aware of it after your posting about the adapter... Oops, I spelled it wrong -- Xitami. I don't know, I haven't actually used it. Jim Madsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> submitt

Re: [Webware-devel] Xitame adapter

2002-09-30 Thread Edmund Lian
On 09/30/2002 11:40:15 PM Ian wrote: >I just looked at it, and thttpd looks pretty minimal. I think wkcgi is >the only option... unless maybe you wanted to hack mod_webkit-like >functionality directly into it and recompile. Seems too hard, but maybe >you could modify thttpd's CGI code to do it

Re: [Webware-devel] Xitame adapter

2002-09-30 Thread Ian Bicking
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 22:23, Edmund Lian wrote: > On 09/30/2002 11:02:40 PM Ian wrote: > > >I was going to put the LRWP adapter into CVS, but a minor question: it > >includes two files, the adapter and an LRWP library (third party). > >Where should I put the library? I hesitate to put it in WebK

Re: [Webware-devel] Xitame adapter

2002-09-30 Thread Edmund Lian
On 09/30/2002 11:02:40 PM Ian wrote: >I was going to put the LRWP adapter into CVS, but a minor question: it >includes two files, the adapter and an LRWP library (third party). >Where should I put the library? I hesitate to put it in WebKit, because >there's already too many files there (it inti