Jason Hildebrand wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 00:36 +0100, RadosÅaw Kintzi wrote:
No it does not. See my patch attached to this message. I tested it, and
it works for me. Should I create bug report on sf.net? Or you apply it
right now in cvs?
I have committed your fix to CVS -- thanks. This fix w
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 00:36 +0100, RadosÅaw Kintzi wrote:
> No it does not. See my patch attached to this message. I tested it, and
> it works for me. Should I create bug report on sf.net? Or you apply it
> right now in cvs?
I have committed your fix to CVS -- thanks. This fix will also prevent
s
I don't know much about the Exception Handler, but it does seem to me a good idea if exceptions set the status code in the HTTP response to an error.
-winston
On Jan 8, 2005, at 2:09 PM, RadosÅaw Kintzi wrote:
Is it a bug that ExceptionHandler does not set response status code to 500?
I've got d
On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 20:09 +0100, RadosÅaw Kintzi wrote:
> Is it a bug that ExceptionHandler does not set response status code to 500?
> I've got database served through HTTP protocol and by Webware behind
> Apache. And I've got a client application to that database. It is robot
> (works without u
