Re: [Webware-discuss] virtual server ready; domain registration up next

2004-04-02 Thread Shayne ONeill
Ah! Tiny world! Far out. I'm actually using webware as the basis of the activismo mk #2 codebase for perth indy (verry much a work in progress). http://a2.perthimc.asn.au/a2/ <==much bustedness, but actually already usable. (data on it just lifted from production mk #1 site) Check newswire and

Re: [Webware-discuss] virtual server ready; domain registration up next

2004-04-02 Thread Ian Bicking
On Apr 2, 2004, at 8:13 PM, Shayne ONeill wrote: I'm gunna throw together a quick wiki servlet (I need it infact for another project anyway). I'll report back later today with a prototype. You should look at this: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/docutils/sandbox/ianb/ wiki/Wik

Re: [Webware-discuss] virtual server ready; domain registration up next

2004-04-02 Thread Shayne ONeill
I'm gunna throw together a quick wiki servlet (I need it infact for another project anyway). I'll report back later today with a prototype. -- Shayne O'Neill http://perth.indymedia.org I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family." George W. Bush On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Jason Hildeb

Re: [Webware-discuss] Re: website: moving forward

2004-04-02 Thread rd
OK, I am going to reply to a bunch of the emails on this thread... (from yet another lurking Webware fanantic) 1) Great logo at http://www.alphamotion.com/jacob_hanson-logo_03.gif 2) Go Debian, boo RedHat 3) Wonky is better than loss of momentum 4) Gentoo ebuild... PLEASE! 5) Webware4P

Re: [Webware-discuss] webwareforpython.org

2004-04-02 Thread Andrew S. Garbutt
Well, I too have lurked around for quite a while... I suppose that I should pipe up as well. I like the 'webwareforpython.org' . Also, I supose, now that i am done with school that i should finish up the first release of pyNuke (shameless plug). :) -Andy Hancock, David (DHANCOCK) wrote: This

RE: [Webware-discuss] webwareforpython.org

2004-04-02 Thread Hancock, David (DHANCOCK)
This long-time lurker also votes for webwareforpython.org. The '4' is a little too cutesy for my taste. "Webware for Python" has been the name of the toolkit for quite some time. I'm glad to see some renewed interest in Webware; I hope I can find a way to contribute. Cheers! -- David Hancock |

[Webware-discuss] virtual server ready; domain registration up next

2004-04-02 Thread Jason Hildebrand
Hi everyone, Shane was quick on the draw and so were the folks at tummy.com. Our new virtual server is up and running: http://198.49.126.114/ I'll spend some time tomorrow setting it up. After that I'll create accounts for anyone who wants to work on the website or use it for other proje

Re: [Webware-discuss] webwareforpython.org

2004-04-02 Thread Todd Grimason
One vote for webwareforpython.org If the '4' version is chosen, does that mean all references in the docs/site/elsewhere will use the digit too? Or just the domain? I think having them both the same is the way to go. Repetition is good for this type of thing. -- ___ [EM

[Webware-discuss] webware4python.org

2004-04-02 Thread Eduardo Elgueta
I vote for that. It helps (me) to promote Python, too. -- Eduardo Elgueta Senior Consultant Navix correo/email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] teléfono/phone: +56 (2) 209-8905 celular/mobile: +56 (9) 821-0033 web: www.navix.cl Av. Pedro de Valdivia 555 Of. 216 Providencia 7500913 Santiago, Chile ---

Re: [Webware-discuss] website: moving forward

2004-04-02 Thread Ian Bicking
Chris Barker wrote: Since I'm not offering to write it, this should be taken with a grain of salt, but I think the Webware really should be run on Webware! A less than full-featured Wiki would be fine with me. Well, at *least* it should be on Python. The present wiki is on Perl, which is no goo

Re: [Webware-discuss] Re: website: moving forward

2004-04-02 Thread Roger Haase
--- Shane McChesney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Any thoughts? > > What about webware4python.org? It's also available in .com, .net, > .ca, > .info, .biz, .us ... > I would vote for the webware4python.org name if that is available because that is close to the original name. The "Webwar

Re: [Webware-discuss] website: moving forward

2004-04-02 Thread Chris Barker
Ian Bicking wrote: I'd rather not keep Twiki, though I'm not sure what should replace it. MoinMoin? Whatever, as long as we can write reST text. (Zwiki? too hard to maintain?) Since I'm not offering to write it, this should be taken with a grain of salt, but I think the Webware really shoul

Re: [Webware-discuss] website: moving forward

2004-04-02 Thread Ian Bicking
Ian Bicking wrote: Frank Barknecht wrote: I can move the Wiki content over. I'd rather not keep Twiki, though I'm not sure what should replace it. MoinMoin? Whatever, as long as we can write reST text. (Zwiki? too hard to maintain?) We also could extend your little reST-wiki. (I'm only hal

Re: [Webware-discuss] website: moving forward

2004-04-02 Thread Ian Bicking
Frank Barknecht wrote: I can move the Wiki content over. I'd rather not keep Twiki, though I'm not sure what should replace it. MoinMoin? Whatever, as long as we can write reST text. (Zwiki? too hard to maintain?) We also could extend your little reST-wiki. (I'm only half joking here.) Yeah

Re: [Webware-discuss] Re: website: moving forward

2004-04-02 Thread Ian Bicking
Shane McChesney wrote: On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 13:14, Jason Hildebrand wrote: Hosting --- Shane McChesney made a generous offer to pay for a virtual server from tummy.com for two years. Shane, does this offer still stand? If so, I think we should go ahead with it. I'd be happy to configure th

Re: [Webware-discuss] website: moving forward

2004-04-02 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Ian Bicking hat gesagt: // Ian Bicking wrote: > Jason Hildebrand wrote: > >Hosting > >--- > >Shane McChesney made a generous offer to pay for a virtual server from > >tummy.com for two years. Shane, does this offer still stand? If so, I > >think we should go ahead with it. I'd be hap

[Webware-discuss] Re: website: moving forward

2004-04-02 Thread Eric Radman
On 12:14 Fri 02 Apr , Jason Hildebrand wrote: > With that in mind, I'd suggest that -- at least for now -- we use the name > "Webware" with subtitle "Python Web Application Toolkit" and this version > of Jacob Hanson's logo, which people generally seemed to like: > > http://www.alphamot

Re: [Webware-discuss] Obscure Fatal Error with callMethodOfServlet

2004-04-02 Thread Jason Hildebrand
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 12:36, David London wrote: > Either I have discovered an obscure fatal error involving > callMethodOfServlet or I am using WebKit incorrectly. Looks like you've discovered a bug. > Firstly, I will apologize if this post is too large, but it seemed > better to include the exa

Re: [Webware-discuss] website: moving forward

2004-04-02 Thread Ian Bicking
Jason Hildebrand wrote: Hi everyone, I'd like to maintain whatever momentum and excitement we have for working on a new website. Project name and logo - This is a big discussion which we don't necessarily have time or energy to have right now. I think we all pretty much agre

[Webware-discuss] Obscure Fatal Error with callMethodOfServlet

2004-04-02 Thread David London
Either I have discovered an obscure fatal error involving callMethodOfServlet or I am using WebKit incorrectly. Firstly, I will apologize if this post is too large, but it seemed better to include the example code instead of trying to explain everything and THEN sending out the code. What is happ

[Webware-discuss] Re: website: moving forward

2004-04-02 Thread Shane McChesney
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 13:14, Jason Hildebrand wrote: > Hosting > --- > Shane McChesney made a generous offer to pay for a virtual server from > tummy.com for two years. Shane, does this offer still stand? If so, I > think we should go ahead with it. I'd be happy to configure the server and >

[Webware-discuss] website: moving forward

2004-04-02 Thread Jason Hildebrand
Hi everyone, I'd like to maintain whatever momentum and excitement we have for working on a new website. Project name and logo - This is a big discussion which we don't necessarily have time or energy to have right now. I think we all pretty much agree that updating the webs