Re: Documentation (was: Re: [Webware-discuss] Another apache detail...)

2002-01-28 Thread Magnus Lie Hetland
Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Now, with an XMLRPC interface... and Emacs happens to have an XMLRPC > library available... well, that could be a much better interface. Wooo... Is this interface something like Ange-FTP-mode? (I really love that...) -- Magnus Lie Hetland

Documentation (was: Re: [Webware-discuss] Another apache detail...)

2002-01-27 Thread Ian Bicking
On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 15:54, Mike Orr wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 09:08:51PM -0600, Ian Bicking wrote: > > Right now a lot of the documentation is going into the Wiki, particular > > works in progress. Maybe it makes sense to make more links from the > > installation instructions to the Wiki

Re: [Webware-discuss] Another apache detail...

2002-01-27 Thread Mike Orr
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 09:08:51PM -0600, Ian Bicking wrote: > Right now a lot of the documentation is going into the Wiki, particular > works in progress. Maybe it makes sense to make more links from the > installation instructions to the Wiki. OTOH, maybe it makes sense to > put the entirety o

Re: [Webware-discuss] Another apache detail...

2002-01-26 Thread Ian Bicking
On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 15:41, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote: > Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [...] > > The Wiki documentation could probably stand to be beefed up. > > I didn't mean to criticise the Wiki; I just thought this information > would be well at home in the otherwise excellent installati

Re: [Webware-discuss] Another apache detail...

2002-01-26 Thread Magnus Lie Hetland
Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] > The Wiki documentation could probably stand to be beefed up. I didn't mean to criticise the Wiki; I just thought this information would be well at home in the otherwise excellent installation manual. > I mostly > just put what I used, at a time when I had

Re: [Webware-discuss] Another apache detail...

2002-01-26 Thread Ian Bicking
On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 14:28, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote: > Jason Hildebrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [...] > > I use Debian and my apache config is in two files: httpd.conf and > > srm.conf. > > Yes, I guess that's pretty standard... Although through the years I've > only used the httpd.conf. They

Re: [Webware-discuss] Another apache detail...

2002-01-26 Thread Magnus Lie Hetland
Jason Hildebrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] > I use Debian and my apache config is in two files: httpd.conf and > srm.conf. Yes, I guess that's pretty standard... Although through the years I've only used the httpd.conf. > The scriptalias directive which defines the cgi directory is in srm.conf

Re: [Webware-discuss] Another apache detail...

2002-01-26 Thread Jason Hildebrand
On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 14:03, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote: > I've found out why my rewrite stuff didn't work; I used a rule that > rewrote things to /cgi-bin/... -- but then Apache looked in > /var/www/html/cgi-bin, while it *should* be looking in > /var/www/cgi-bin. It seems that the ScriptAlias decl

[Webware-discuss] Another apache detail...

2002-01-26 Thread Magnus Lie Hetland
I've found out why my rewrite stuff didn't work; I used a rule that rewrote things to /cgi-bin/... -- but then Apache looked in /var/www/html/cgi-bin, while it *should* be looking in /var/www/cgi-bin. It seems that the ScriptAlias declaration didn't help here. Shouldn't it? Is there a "standard" t