Re: [Webware-discuss] Common Practices

2001-07-11 Thread Ian Bicking
Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One positive part of a redirect is that once the person has submitted > > the form successfully, they won't/can't reload the page and resubmit > > the form. > > Does that screw up the entry in the history list? In other words, if > they do want to go bac

Re: [Webware-discuss] Common Practices

2001-07-10 Thread Mike Orr
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:03:40PM -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: > One positive part of a redirect is that once the person has submitted > the form successfully, they won't/can't reload the page and resubmit > the form. Does that screw up the entry in the history list? In other words, if they do w

Re: [Webware-discuss] Common Practices

2001-07-10 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
At 03:40 PM 7/10/2001 -0700, Tim Roberts wrote: >Have I made my query > at all clear? Yes you have. I've used both approaches which pretty much have the pros and cons you mentioned. The browser redirect is: self.response().sendRedirect('someURL') The internal redirect is: se

Re: [Webware-discuss] Common Practices

2001-07-10 Thread Ian Bicking
"Tim Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm pretty clear on how to implement the first two stages with > WebKit. I'm not so clear on common practice for the third. In the > past, I've just generated a simple HTTP redirect using the Refresh: > header. This has the downside of causing another

[Webware-discuss] Common Practices

2001-07-10 Thread Tim Roberts
I'm experimenting with WebWare and have just signed on to this mailing list. I've done a couple of mid-sized web sites with plain Python CGI and HTTPgen, and I like the structure that WebKit brings. However, I'd like to learn more about the strategies that seem to work for real folks. One of