Re: [Webware-discuss] Extending ThreadedAppServer.RequestHandler.handleRequest()

2003-02-16 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Karl Putland hat gesagt: // Karl Putland wrote: > On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 02:25, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > I see another problem: I doubt, that the IP adress can fully identify > > a user, if you have proxies or firewalls in between. > Not to mention that an aol client changes IP addresses f

Re: [Webware-discuss] Extending ThreadedAppServer.RequestHandler.handleRequest()

2003-02-15 Thread James R. Phillips
> I see another problem: I doubt, that the IP adress can fully identify > a user, if you have proxies or firewalls in between. A) Oops. B) Dang. C) Hmmm... I'm going to take the advice of kicking off the slow process in a new thread, and returning a monitor page. In doing so I will have the th

Re: [Webware-discuss] Extending ThreadedAppServer.RequestHandler.handleRequest()

2003-02-15 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Ian Bicking hat gesagt: // Ian Bicking wrote: > On Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 06:38 AM, James R. Phillips wrote: > >I have the user's IP address for use in distinguishing different > >users on different threads. > > Will this really work? I mean, will a browser keep sending data even

Re: [Webware-discuss] Extending ThreadedAppServer.RequestHandler.handleRequest()

2003-02-14 Thread Aaron Held
Nick Murtagh wrote: Ian Bicking wrote: Will this really work? I mean, will a browser keep sending data even as its getting completed responses? There are components in IE and Mozilla that allow you to make HTTP requests manually using Javascript. You can even do asynchronous requests. Nick

Re: [Webware-discuss] Extending ThreadedAppServer.RequestHandler.handleRequest()

2003-02-14 Thread Nick Murtagh
Ian Bicking wrote: Will this really work? I mean, will a browser keep sending data even as its getting completed responses? There are components in IE and Mozilla that allow you to make HTTP requests manually using Javascript. You can even do asynchronous requests. Nick

Re: [Webware-discuss] Extending ThreadedAppServer.RequestHandler.handleRequest()

2003-02-13 Thread Ian Bicking
On Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 06:38 AM, James R. Phillips wrote: At http://zunzun.com, I have processes that can possibly take a couple of minutes to complete. What I would like to do when handling some of the browser requests is to immediately send the user a status page, call the methods a

Re: [Webware-discuss] Extending ThreadedAppServer.RequestHandler.handleRequest()

2003-02-13 Thread Aaron Held
A couple of points: It sounds like you would be changing a "transport" level function that would need to be handled on the app level. If you need to write javascript then it should correspond to servlet code. If you need to write browser software it should correspond to HTTPServlet. I have h

[Webware-discuss] Extending ThreadedAppServer.RequestHandler.handleRequest()

2003-02-13 Thread James R. Phillips
I need to extend ThreadedAppServer.RequestHandler.handleRequest(), and would like to discuss doing so before embarking on the work. As Webware is currently written a browser or XML-RPC request must wait until all application-side processing of that request has completed before receiving a finished