On Monday 26 November 2001 06:23 pm, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> How many people have actually written custom servlet factories?
I have. Most frequently for text heavy pages that still need the
customized header, sidebar and footer of the web site.
I use the extension .htmlf and simply install the fact
On Thursday 22 November 2001 05:42 pm, Darryl wrote:
> I'd like to add that webware should keep it's user management
> abstract enough that when someone grafts a GUI onto their
> business and data objects they dont' have to re-invent the wheel.
I agree wholeheartedly with that and have taken that
On Monday 26 November 2001 17:02, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
> On Sunday November 25, 2001 03:24 pm, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> > That's true, but the developer doesn't neccessarily have direct
> > access to those servlets ... unless they make a custom servlet
> > factory for unknown file types. And if you
On Sunday November 25, 2001 03:24 pm, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> On Saturday 24 November 2001 21:06, Ian Bicking wrote:
> > Let's see, I missed most of the latter part of this discussion.
> > I'll add to the Wiki pages, but there's a particular point I was
> > confused about:
> >
> > On Wed, 2001-11-21 a
On Saturday 24 November 2001 21:06, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Let's see, I missed most of the latter part of this discussion.
> I'll add to the Wiki pages, but there's a particular point I was
> confused about:
>
> On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 14:13, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> > * At what stage in the request-respo
Let's see, I missed most of the latter part of this discussion. I'll
add to the Wiki pages, but there's a particular point I was confused
about:
On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 14:13, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> * At what stage in the request-response cycle does authentification
> take place (Adapter, Applicatio
I'd like to add that webware should keep it's user management
abstract enough that when someone grafts a GUI onto their
business and data objects they dont' have to re-invent the wheel.
-Darryl
___
Webware-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
On Thursday 22 November 2001 13:04, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 11:26:59AM -0800, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> > > As can be guessed from what I've just written, it makes sense
> > > to "extend" sessions to allow a user identity to be associated
> > > with them. But no more than that should b
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 11:26:59AM -0800, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> > As can be guessed from what I've just written, it makes sense to
> > "extend" sessions to allow a user identity to be associated with
> > them. But no more than that should be involved; certainly not what
> > rights someone has.
>
>
and here's a more technical paper on authentication:
Title: Do's and Don'ts of Client Authentication on the Web
http://cookies.lcs.mit.edu/pubs/webauth:tr.pdf
includes cases studies from 27 sites
___
Webware-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
Here's an excellent summary http://www.wwnet.net/~janc/auth.html !
___
Webware-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
On Thursday 22 November 2001 03:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tavis Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Remember, this discussion is about a UserManagement system that
> > can be used for the various application ideas on the AppIdeas
> > wiki page. Most of those would fall into the 'large, complex
Tavis Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Remember, this discussion is about a UserManagement system that can
>be used for the various application ideas on the AppIdeas wiki page.
>Most of those would fall into the 'large, complex' category. We
>would really need to discuss the permissions sys
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 10:13, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 10:21:30AM -0800, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> > > In the more general sense, you might want to have relations. A
> > > person can "own" something, perhaps another person is the
> > > "creator", or "manager", etc. I suppose th
14 matches
Mail list logo
