<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Geoffrey Talvola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"'Skorobeus'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:56 PM
Subject: RE: [Webware-discuss] PSP vs. Servlets? + OT sidetracked
rant on work flow
--- Geoffrey Talvola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Are you using self.includeURL() from the controller servlet to
> pull in the
> psp's? Or self.callMethodOfServlet()?
>
> - Geoff
I'm using self.includeURL() for includeing the views.
Then when the controller is done, It does a response.sen
Karl Putland wrote:
> I've taken a different route that might be of interest and I wonder
> if the two ideas can be merged?
>
> I've gone the MVC route, where I have servlets that are the
> controllers, then one or more psp(s) that are the views for the
> servlet. For instance a servlet:
>
> Cu
--- Geoffrey Talvola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Murphy wrote:
> > >When I'm creating a new page, I'll usually go ahead and
> > create both an
> > >"empty" PSP and an "empty" Servlet that is the PSP's base
> > class. Then I'll
> > >start putting the "preparation" methods into the Servle
Kevin Murphy wrote:
> >When I'm creating a new page, I'll usually go ahead and
> create both an
> >"empty" PSP and an "empty" Servlet that is the PSP's base
> class. Then I'll
> >start putting the "preparation" methods into the Servlet,
> and the rendering
> >into the PSP. You might try worki
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 11:06:12 -0400, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
>You can get the best of both worlds by having a servlet base class with a
>PSP that inherits from the base class. That's what I do when I have pages
>with both a fair amount of supporting Python code and a lot of HTML markup.
>(In fact
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:52:38AM -0400, David Casti wrote:
> My company has version 1 of our billing system written in PSP. We've had
> some success with the product, and are in the process of finishing version
> 2. The question is: Should we stick with PSP, or go to Servlets? A more
> gen
