Why aren't you returning 'velocity.Scheduler.product.success'? Did you debug
the ServletDispatcher to see what the result and the view output is?
- Original Message -
From: "G.L. Grobe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "matt baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Forwarding to new site.
How do you know it is not reaching the view? Is it returning 404 or some
other error?
- Original Message -
From: "G.L. Grobe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 6:19 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] actions not returning view cor
os-ww list for all WW related stuff
- Original Message -
From: "Toby Hede" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:26 PM
Subject: [Webwork-devel] Re: [Webwork-user] WW integration
> Is there no separate ww development list? Is th
Yes because WW is providing a wrapper around HTTP Session.
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan LeCompte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:39 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Session (Map) contents.
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm curious... do the objects t
see below.
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Christoph Kiehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Webwork-use
Yes, we could really use some help in regards to Velocity+WebWork. For now,
the preferred format is still docbook. I will be transitioning this soon. If
you are still interested, you can e-mail me offline to work out the doc
details.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Logemann" <[EMA
What are you using instead of Aspect and why did you decide not to use it?
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christoph Kiehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Webwork-user] Why I like WebWork
Chr
- Original Message -
From: "Toby Hede" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Webwork-user] SOAP and Webwork - does it make sense
> I have been thinking about some of these issues myself recently, and
act
>
> >4. Begin work on leveraging the synergy of the merge.
> >- IMO, I believe a key to OS is concise well-built building blocks. A
> >developer can choose to use only OS-Cache, Sitemesh, WW, FormTags,
> >OS-Workflow, or all of them. Abstracting out core functionality like bean
> >manipulation, co
> > 1. Does OS need 13 mailing lists? I suggest one general mail list,
one
> >per module, and one cvs mail list. There should be no need to cross post
> >messages. If the message pertains to the group, then send it there;
> >otherwise, send it to the module specific list. If traffic is light
e
>
> > 1. Does OS need 13 mailing lists?
>
> Yes, we hate our mailing lists, but the admin tools don't have any way to
> remove them! We'll have to bug the SF people directly I suppose. We really
> only want os-dev, os-users, and os-cvsmail.
>
You can delete them or not make them public.
-
Well, so far there seems to be a consensus to move WW under OS's umbrella.
Great! Now what? I propose the following -
1. Migrate WW with Opensymphony.
- The focus is to move the code and issue tracking to OS. I assume I would
work with Mike to make this transition happen.
- WW on SF will referen
Last chance! Anybody using CSS theme taglib?
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:16 PM
Subject: [Webwork-devel] CSS tags
> Is anybody using the CSS tags? I'm in the process of
> making sure our standard tags are XHT
I committed this fix and fixed URLTag to allow you to override the request
params with children param tags.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Webwork-user] redirect acti
Can you submit a simple example that illustrates the problem?
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Webwork-user] Re: Performance of ParameterAware
Need to get this scenario recorded. Aapo, will you add a comment?
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/webwork/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?id=10
000
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:45 AM
Subject: RE: [
Go here and you can search the forum for past conversations concerning
"redirect"
http://www.mail-archive.com/webwork-user@lists.sourceforge.net/
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:04 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] wh
legacy method. I removed it.
- Original Message -
From: "Harvey Kandola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.java.webwork.user
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 10:46 AM
Subject: [Webwork-user] handlesCommands() ?
> protected boolean handlesCommands() { return tr
my.yyy.action will map to
yyy.vm or calls to my.action will map to x.vm. Will this not give you the
flexibility you need?
- Original Message -
From: "Aapo Laakkonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Matt Baldree'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm not quite sure what you are after. Can you give a more concrete example?
- Original Message -
From: "Aapo Laakkonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 5:37 AM
Subject: RE: [Webwork-user] Using views as an action
> >> What is the proper way to ma
done. thx.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Quellenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:59 AM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Two small problems
> Hallo,
>
> we found two small bugs in webwork (and more important, two fixes):
> - in class NodeWalker a
I fixed the call order to super() in the latest CVS as well as the branch.
See if this fixes the problem. If you are correct and Orion doesn't call
release(), then we will need to place the release logic in the doEndTag() as
well. Will you check on this and let me know?
-Matt
- Original Mess
Hmm. We might need the logic in *both* places. WebLogic needs logic in
release() which is more spec compliant in that release is called to set
state. I'm not intimate with Orion but it sounds like you would be correct
if it doesn't call release(). I will fix the release order calls to super().
Thx
Good points. I'll take a look at this.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Heng Sin Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:10 PM
Subject: RE:Re: FW: [Webwork-user] multipart support
> 1. It might be usefull if there is support for
> uploading to me
I assume you mean moving the filter logic in the ServletDispatcher and wrap
the request there. I'll take a look.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Lightbody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Webwork-User"
I added multipart support to WW. I looked at a couple of approaches at
solving this problem and settled in using a filter to wrap the request. I
thought this was the cleanest, less obtrusive solution. You have the ability
to choose between Jason's multipart parse (watch the license) and Pell's by
Just a reminder that all CVS traffic is now forward to the CVS mailing list
and not webwork developer list.
-Matt
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. E
Send me some code with the environment you are working on and we'll take a
look.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Chonalal, Anil (Contractor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 5:27 AM
Subject: help on webwork
> I am having some problems with webw
[chain actions]
I proto the chain action feature but I was unable to convince myself that
there is a compelling reason to have this over what we have now. Nor was
anybody able to present a compelling argument for this. So for now I tabled
this and am moving on to other requests.
[attachment aware
I have implemented escaping HTML from within WW tags. Basically, I added an
escape property to PROPERTY tag which is used for all UI tags and thus will
escape them as well. By default, I have PROPERTY escaping. I have a few
questions before I commit this.
1. What exactly do we need to escape? All
In webwork.properties, the "webwork.action.packages" is set to
"skeleton.action" and not "com.skeleton.action". So, in your JSP page you
would post to formtest.action where this is mapped in your views file
views.properties or actions.xml.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Fredrik Karlss
Well, this worked fine for me. In this scenario, the WW property/calendar
retrieves the date object from the action on the stack and the WW pram/..
fetches this object to set in Date.
Looking at your code I'm wondering if should be .
- Original Message -
From: "Ri
I don't think anybody answered you on this. Its quite common to use hidden
tags to store the values as they are passed form to form.
- Original Message -
From: "yes I am" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:22 AM
Subject: [Webwork-user] wizard behav
I wanted to throw out a feature prioritization strawman and see what people
thought. I did not list the Java Spec API support like Java Server Faces and
others since these are not released at this time. Here is what I believe are
priorities. This list doesn't mean other items cannot be worked on b
WebWork finds its Actions from its properties file. If you are working from
the WAR file the place to look for this file is under WEB-INF/classes. In
this file there is a property name "webwork.action.packages" that is set to
"webwork.examples, webwork.action.standard". This property tells WebWork
Seems like the easy fix would be to change WebTable to
public void addParameter(String name, Object value)
{
BeanUtil.setProperty(name, value, this);
super.addParameter(name, value);
}
You may have some duplication but it should work. I haven't worked with the
table tag much. I be
WebWork 1.0.2 was released which includes numerous bug fixes and FAQ for
installing the WAR on WebLogic 6.1 and 7.0. See the CHANGES.txt for more
details.
-Matt
___
Webwork-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listi
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:05 AM
> To: 'Matt Baldree'
> Cc: WebWork-User (E-Mail)
> Subject: AW: [Webwork-user] ui:radio
>
>
> Hi Matt,
>
>
> thanks for your answer. Yes, I can duplicate the error with
> the test pages.
> I h
e. It
will not print "Success".
13) webwork:if test="bool('true') == true"
Success
So, looks like a bug. Thanks.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Farquhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
see inline
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Farquhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10:10 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] webwork:if tag problems
> I am having problems with the webwork:if tag, and I am not sure if I am
> doing something wrong.
>
>
You can take the ui:radio in the form test and duplicate it and it works
fine. Can you duplicate the error with one of the test pages or submit some
code?
- Original Message -
From: "Graf Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Matt Baldree'&qu
In a recent project, we used a theme filter that determined the appropriate
theme to return (XHTML, VXML, WML). Just another idea you might want to look
at.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Toby Hede" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 2
try
Ok
- Original Message -
From: "Graf Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WebWork-User (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:42 AM
Subject: [Webwork-user] How to use Referrer.action ?
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use the ww Referrer class in my project.
> In case
done. thx.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Cannon-Brookes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:22 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Annoyance with UI tags
> Minor annoyance with the UI tags that took me an hour or two to track down
> (I thought I was
Try quoting the label. Without the quote, WW is looking for a method with
that name.
- Original Message -
From: "Graf Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WebWork-User (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:42 AM
Subject: [Webwork-user] ui:radio
> Hello,
>
> I h
- Original Message -
From: "erik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:31 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Dynamic Include
Hello,
I saw some discussion on dynamic includes but haven't found anything that
works yet. Here is what I want to do:
"/>
The $
It is not integrated but I just finished a project that used Apache Axis as
a client to WebWork to make SOAP-DSIG calls. It was pretty easy. If you go
to Apache Axis mailing list and search for "axis and cryptography" you will
find the thread of discussion that explains what I did. I've been toyin
Tomcat 4.0.2 and 4.0.3 have a classloader bug. You can extract the
taglib.tld from the JAR and modify the web.xml or upgrade to 4.0.4b2.
- Original Message -
From: "Vladimir Yusseem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:59 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user]
Can you provide more specifics - what WL version, JDK, is it WL out of the
box, etc. Enough so we can try and reproduce it.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Ashish Jain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 6:07 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Webwork Js
4th draft of possible next release feature/requirements based on what people
have posted. I've also listed the person that requested the
feature/requirement based on memory. Could be wrong? Looks like we have a
pretty good list. I'll wait for revisions and then I propose that my next
post be for i
makes sense to me.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:52 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] DRAFT 3 - next release features/requirements
> Has anybody ever seen the IBM Redbook documentation ? They are a
> practi
The problem occurs sometimes because Tomcat is not able to extract the
taglib.tld from the JAR file. To fix the problem, extract taglib.tld from
the JAR and place it somewhere under the WEB-INF directory. Modify the
web.xml to point to this file.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Miki Mo
3rd draft of possible next release feature/requirements based on what people
have posted. Right now these are candidate ideas. Once we have a good list,
we can repost for inclusion/exclusion/prioritization, etc.
Other ideas?
Documentation
1. Better velocity documentation
2. A more detailed secti
So here is a revised list of possible next release feature/requirements
based on what people have posted. Other ideas?
Documentation
1. Better velocity documentation
2. A more detailed section describing the view mapping focusing on using
actions.xml and views.properties with an example contai
Well some of these are more or less trace statements. Send me a diff of what
debug/trace you found helpful in understanding/debugging and we'll take a
look.
- Original Message -
From: "Christoph Kiehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:55 AM
Subje
What are you trying to do here?
- Original Message -
From: "Christoph Kiehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:42 AM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Should this work with EL?
> Hi,
>
> should this construct work with EL?
>
>
> Thanx
>
> Christoph
>
There seems to be a problem with running WW's example WAR in Tomcat with
JDK1.4 using Tomcat's startup.bat (see console output below). The problem
has been tracked down to the fact that Tomcat using JDK's XML parser is
having problems extracting the taglib.tld from webwork.jar. The patch fix is
to
I'll add it in the docs. thx.
- Original Message -
From: "Vedovato Paolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Slava Zimine'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:29 AM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Searchable Mailing-List Archives
to the ww-developers: this info could
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Fifield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WebWork User List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 5:42 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] i18n usage question
> I have a simple jsp page with a form which makes use of the text('key')
> syntax to get messages
I just released 1.0.1 which includes a full length HTML of the docs, a PDF
of the docs, and a fix to taglib.tld which caused some random parse errors
for a few people.
-Matt
___
Webwork-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.ne
I believe the problem was that the taglib did not have a namespace defined
because I was getting an error trying to validate it. I added the namespace
and it now validates fine.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Slava Zimine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Baldree&qu
I'm on that. I'll respin the release and get the online docs updated.
- Original Message -
From: "Rickard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Webwork-user] Tag Reference Documentation
Pe
What jars are in your lib and common/lib folders?
- Original Message -
From: "Slava Zimine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 7:31 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] webwork example webapp jsp does not work
> Hello, to all.
>
> i'm trying the webwork
Well, WW 1.0 is out the door. Many thanks go out to everyone involved
especially Rickard and Maurice. The only thing left now is for Rickard to
announce WW to the world.
-Matt
___
Webwork-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.
Rickard, are you going to release?
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Cannon-Brookes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rickard Oberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Taavi Tiirik"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Webwork-user] tag enchantment
I just downloaded the latest Tomcat (4.0.3) and everything tested fine.
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Webwork-User (E-mail)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monda
hmm. I tested with Tomcat 4.0.1.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Webwork-User (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:06 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Current CVS snapshot w/ Tomcat
Has anyone gotten the latest CVS source running o
The latest code in CVS is up and running and all tests should work. Please
feel free to check it out and test it. I believe the only thing left before
1.0 release is a couple of sections (HVAC and Action) in the docs and
Rickard to push the button. If I'm missing anything please yell.
-Matt
__
You can also return any string from your action's execute that the
dispatcher will use as a key to fetch a URI from the request object. If the
dispatcher does not find an object from the request with this key it will
then try and find a view from your view map.
-Matt
- Original Message -
Filed it as a potential bug to be looked at later.
thx.
- Original Message -
From: "Christoph Kiehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 4:19 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] BUG with set methods for object properties
> Hi,
>
> I think I discovered a bug
Can you provide some specific code snippets?
- Original Message -
From: "G.L. Grobe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 10:16 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] onchange attributes
> Instead of using my own template theme's as before, I'm trying to ta
These are good points. I'll add it as a bug so we won't forget this.
- Original Message -
From: "Taavi Tiirik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 5:53 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Re: webwork tag not safe to use
> And I forgot to add that this
why not do ...
..
..
- Original Message -
From: "Gregory Lucas-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:27 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] around a set of checkboxes?
Hi there,
I need to do this in my JSP:
2.3
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Webwork-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 12:28 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Servlet 2.3 vs 2.2
> All:
>
> I'm trying to run the latest source of webwork on Webshpere Application
> Developer W
I added multi-select capability to the JSP select tag and added an example
usage to the formtest.jsp.
-Matt
___
Webwork-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
Does your action implement CommandDriven?
- Original Message -
From: "Sven Kuenzler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Webwork-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:11 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] Command driven actions and actions.xml
> Hello!
>
> I am running into a probl
76 matches
Mail list logo
