Re: Fw: [Webwork-user] revised - next release features/requirements

2002-04-15 Thread Sven Kuenzler
> Where should we go then? IMHO a XSLT stylesheet with custom XSLT > extension should work well. > > Stylesheet for the view could be > > ... > > > > ... > > ... > > ... > > ... > > > > Whereas the xslt engine uses custom handlers for the tags. > IIRC XSLT2.0 will specifiy a standard way

Re: [Webwork-user] rc - next release features

2002-04-15 Thread Sven Kuenzler
> 18. Factor out HTTP stuff out of the dispatcher. > [suggested by Sven] I guess my reference to the dispatcher was misleading here - should be ActionFactory/ActionContext(?). Sven ___ Webwork-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://li

Re: Fw: [Webwork-user] revised - next release features/requirements

2002-04-15 Thread Sven Kuenzler
> > Anyway, would it really be too hard to make a SAXFilter that clones WW's > > core taglib functionality? Normally, the tricky part with SAX are state > > keeping issues. But most of this state keeping stuff should be handled by > > the ValueStack already. Or am I wrong? > > It's possible but no

Re: Fw: [Webwork-user] revised - next release features/requirements

2002-04-14 Thread Sven Kuenzler
> > Something like that, yes. As I suggested, one could try to create a > > SAXFilter with a functionality similar to WW's core jsp taglib. The other > > possibilty would be a XSLT extension. But as I said, I'd like to have the > > opportunity to reuse WW actions in C2. And integrating such an ex

Fw: [Webwork-user] revised - next release features/requirements

2002-04-08 Thread Sven Kuenzler
- Original Message - From: "Sven Kuenzler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Philipp Meier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [Webwork-user] revised - next release features/requirements > > > > On the other hand,

Re: [Webwork-user] revised - next release features/requirements

2002-04-07 Thread Sven Kuenzler
> I did not get your point here. XSLT is currently integrated as a view > layer - not as a dispatcher. A drawback of the implementation is that I meant XSLT *servlet*, sorry. > there is currently no way to call an action from a stylesheet like it is > possible with the webwork:action tag. But t

Re: [Webwork-user] revised - next release features/requirements

2002-04-07 Thread Sven Kuenzler
> The XSLT view stuff should be enhanced slightly to be really useful. We > need some XSLT java extension for URL-escaping and so on. I don't know > if I'll have the time but I don't want to give up the XSLT thingy. So > is their anybody except me using it? Huh? Well, I am using it. At the moment

AW: Fwd: [Webwork-user] XSLTServlet error interface

2002-02-08 Thread Sven Kuenzler
> What is the webwork.log4j.configfile property set to? Is it a new feature that you have to set this option? I'm pretty sure that it worked without it until recently. Anyway yes, that missing option was the problem. I attached an updated version auf XSLTServlet.java. What I did - updated the

[Webwork-user] XSLTServlet error interface

2002-02-06 Thread Sven Kuenzler
Due to an urgent personal demand I've fixed a TODO in XSLTServlet.java, "a nicer error interface". What I have done (see attachment) works ... until I redeploy my webapp. When redeploying, I get these log entries (Instead of the hundreds of Saxons ambiguity warnings I expect *sigh*): [ERROR,Defa

AW: [Webwork-user] Command driven actions and actions.xml

2002-01-30 Thread Sven Kuenzler
Well, now it does ;-) Thx, Sven > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Matt > Baldree > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2002 01:15 > An: Sven Kuenzler; Webwork-User > Betreff: Re: [Webwork-user] Comma

[Webwork-user] Command driven actions and actions.xml

2002-01-30 Thread Sven Kuenzler
Hello! I am running into a problem configuring a command driven action in actions.xml. My config file looks like this: xslt/norm.xsl xslt/search2.xsl xslt/copy.xsl When hitting http://host/context/StandardSearch.action, WebWork calls Search2.doExecute().