Re: [weewx-development] Re: Package weewx like other python projects

I don't blame you. To keep the discussion focused, and a little more formal, I've started issue #552 . Please move the discussion there. -tk On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:58 AM Vince Skahan wrote: > On Tuesday, May 12, 2020 at 11:30:42 AM UTC-7, Tom Keff

Re: [weewx-development] Re: Package weewx like other python projects

On Tuesday, May 12, 2020 at 11:30:42 AM UTC-7, Tom Keffer wrote: > > I'm with you, Till, but I still need a volunteer! 😀 > > > Sorry if I diverted the discussion any. I was trying to understand what problem(s) we're trying to solve, so I can assess if I can help or not. - If the goal is to mak

Re: [weewx-development] Re: Package weewx like other python projects

Till Maas writes: >> The downside of option-2 is what would we do if a security vulnerability > > Another downside, which is what led me to start the discussion, is that > this makes weewx different from other Python projects which makes my > generic Python/Linux experience less useful because e

Re: [weewx-development] Re: Package weewx like other python projects

I'm with you, Till, but I still need a volunteer! 😀 On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:28 AM Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 01:27:01PM -0700, Vince Skahan wrote: > > > Option-2 is how big apps like splunk and puppet do it. They bundle the > > interpreter+libs they need under their t

Re: [weewx-development] Re: Package weewx like other python projects

Hi, On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 01:27:01PM -0700, Vince Skahan wrote: > Option-2 is how big apps like splunk and puppet do it. They bundle the > interpreter+libs they need under their tree. If you think about it, it's > also how RHEL chose to work the python issue for RHEL-8. They don't use >