Sorry for the slow reply thanks to your helpful info, I found out that
I was missing the pyephem module wasn't installed.
So as part my machine update that hadn't gotten updated. I did also check
the maxSolarRad = prefer_hardware setting first
and made sure it was set that way as well.
N
was getting around to fixing my two UV sensors
(upgrading one and adding enhancements to the enclosure to try to prevent
moisture problems) and I saw that the graph was gone.
I'm probably missing something stupid any pointers?
Thanks in advance,
Earl Baugh
--
You received this m
d be clarifying.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 3:13 PM Tom Keffer wrote:
> There's no magic here. If the record has a type 'lightning_noise_count',
> and the database schema has a matching entry, then it will be put in the
> database. But, the names have to match precisely, includin
be used by default. If you don't like that,
> then you can specify a different "extractor."
>
> You can suggest some changes here (or, better, in weewx-development), or
> submit a PR on GitHub.
>
> -tk
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:21 AM Earl Baugh wrote
n the record will
> be filled in with the sum of all values seen in the LOOP packets over the
> archive period, in other words, the total number of lightning strikes.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> -tk
>
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 2:00 PM Earl Baugh wrote:
>
>>
>>
> On Nov 7, 2020, at 4:47 PM, vince wrote:
>
>
>> On Friday, November 6, 2020 at 10:53:12 AM UTC-8, Earl Baugh wrote:
>> I see in the weewx db schema that there are:
>>
>> 'lightning_distance','REAL'
>> 'lightning_
Are there any references to how these are supposed to be added?
Was there any specific release notes on this?
I did find one forum post when they were added to the distribution, but no
details on their use...
Earl
On Friday, November 6, 2020 at 1:53:12 PM UTC-5 Earl Baugh wrote:
>
>
Got a few questions about lightning data.
(to start with, I'm utilizing my own sensors and posting data from each
into an MQTT channel, and using the Weewx MQTT reader to take that data and
convert it into loop records and then let the rest of the system take care
of it from there...)
I se
