Re: [weewx-user] GW1000 0.1.0b12 bugs ??

2020-09-21 Thread Tim Tuck
Hi Graham, I have my PM sensor on ch2, it was on ch1 until a battery change and it moved itself and I was too lazy to move it back. The [[field_map]] is the default and I also tried the following...  [[field_map_extensions]]     uvradiation = radiation     pm2_52 = pm2_5 which

Re: [weewx-user] GW1000 0.1.0b12 bugs ??

2020-09-21 Thread Graham Eddy
pm2_52 and wh41_ch2_batt (corresponding battery) and giving good values. pm2_5 is absent and wh41_ch1_batt is None. is that sensor charged and working (eg shows fine in WS View)? and what is your [[field_map]] or [[field_map_extensions]]? > On 21 Sep 2020, at 5:56 pm, Tim Tuck wrote: > > Hi

[weewx-user] GW1000 0.1.0b12 bugs ??

2020-09-21 Thread Tim Tuck
Hi Gary, I've just been testing a new install of weewx 4.1.1 and I've found that the GW1000 driver is not populating the radiation and pm2_5 fields of the database. I'm viewing the database with DB browser for SQLite. Running the driver on the command line I see the data being collected...