[weewx-user] Re: GW1000 - solar radiation data lost while switching from Interceptor to API driver

2020-12-16 Thread gjr80
Hi, The short answer is that radiation (aka solar insulation) or an equivalent is not available via the GW1000 API so the GW1000 driver does not emit it. The reason you see it on Ecowitt pages and WU is that the GW1000 takes what the GW1000 API refers to as 'light' in lux and approximates solar

Re: [weewx-user] Re: GW1000 - solar radiation data lost while switching from Interceptor to API driver

2020-12-17 Thread 'Rainer Lang' via weewx-user
Thanks, Gary that was enlightening 😎 - and apart from planning to explain the details more in the wiki (which is highly appreciated), I suggest to include the above entries to the [[Corrections]] stanza also in the readme file that comes with GW1000 API driver and also include them - unless alread

Re: [weewx-user] Re: GW1000 - solar radiation data lost while switching from Interceptor to API driver

2020-12-17 Thread Jerry Tesar
Thank you from me aswell. I received my PWS yesterday, used the GW1000 driver and was about to ask the same question, then I found this. I have one more question about pressure mapping. I noticed the driver maps "absbarometer" to "pressure" but the "relbarometer" to "relbarometer" aswell, which

Re: [weewx-user] Re: GW1000 - solar radiation data lost while switching from Interceptor to API driver

2020-12-17 Thread gjr80
Whilst I am happy to document the process to enable the approximation of radiation in the wiki, I am less willing to force calculation of radiation via StdCalculate. Largely because the extension installer is somewhat limited and it uses an all or nothing approach - radiation will be set to cal

Re: [weewx-user] Re: GW1000 - solar radiation data lost while switching from Interceptor to API driver

2020-12-17 Thread gjr80
Hi, Yes the default mapping used by the GW1000 driver will map absbarometer to WeeWX field pressure and relbarometer is mapped to WeeWX field relbarometer (though in reality nothing will be done with relbarometer as it is extremely unlikely the user would have field relbarometer in their databa