Am Saturday, 6. June 2020 11:48:05 UTC+2 NanoG5Kite wrote:
>
>
>
>
> https://github.com/matthewwall/weewx-interceptor/pull/64/commits/00bdecdc1822d7deaa7c41f20dfc4c30a349936d
>
>
>
>
The interceptor driver is python 2/3 compatible. Most likely you only have the
WeeWX python 3 prerequisites installed and hence running the driver under
python 2 failed.
Gary
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from
I got it to work, in addition to your help, I had to change python to
python3 for some reason
# PYTHONPATH=/usr/share/weewx python3 /usr/share/weewx/user/interceptor.py
--device=ecowitt-client --mode=listen --port=8000
mapped packet: {'dateTime': 1593010224, 'usUnits': 1, 'pressure': 29.202,
Your PYTHONPATH needs to include /usr/share/weewx. Try using:
$ PYTHONPATH=/usr/share/weewx python ..
Gary
On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 22:13:38 UTC+10, John Burricelli wrote:
>
> Also, has anyone been able to run the driver manually? I get this error
> when I try it that way.
>
> $
Also, has anyone been able to run the driver manually? I get this error
when I try it that way.
$ PYTHONPATH=bin python /usr/share/weewx/user/interceptor.py
--device=ecowitt --mode=listen --port=8000
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/weewx/user/interceptor.py", line 302, in
I had a decent storm come through last night with nearly 50 reported
lightning strikes via my ecowitt app. As far as i can tell however nothing
is being inserted into the database.
INSERT INTO archive_day_lightning_energy
VALUES(1592884800,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,0.0,0,0.0,0);
INSERT INTO
Hi Oliver
I'm using your patched script and it's working fine.
I insert these fields into th database:
[[sensor_map_extensions]]
lightning_strike_count = lightning_num
lightning_distance = lightning
These 2 fields are also coming from the sensor:
lightning_time
wh57batt
But
Oli, I don‘t think so. Possible most users like me do not have the
(scripting/programming) skills to change necessary lines in the
interceptor.py or weewx to adapt new/additional sensor values.
I gave up for the moment - Even if I could get the lightning counts
adapted, I would fail with the
Hi!
Are there any experiences with the adjusted script regarding lightning?
Does it work for you now?
Regards, Oliver
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
You would have to script it, but this command will convert the date.
# date -d @1592562248
Fri 19 Jun 06:24:08 EDT 2020
On Friday, June 19, 2020 at 6:28:10 AM UTC-4, NanoG5Kite wrote:
>
> Hi Gert,
>
> then you are further than me the last time and I also did another error
> last time, using:
>
Hi Gert,
then you are further than me the last time and I also did another error
last time, using:
[[sensor_map]]insteadt of [[sensor_map_extensions]]
So I have no really good answer for now. But will try also over the weekend.
What I know so far. The lightning_time is Unix time - so for
Hi Matthias
Yes I have the data and data inserted into the DB. But with this setting:
[[sensor_map_extensions]]
lightning_strike_count = lightning_num
lightning_distance = lightning
You're missing this information:
lightning_time
wh57batt
Because these fields are not mapped to
Hi Gert,
I‘m not sure about the Battery Value, but has your sensor and gw1000 ever
detected one strike before? You need this first strike to get all data
points.
Br,
Matthias
Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2020 06:42:15 UTC+2 schrieb Gert Andersen:
>
> Hi
> I'm also waiting to the next strike.
>
>
Hi
I'm also waiting to the next strike.
What do you do with the 2 other fields:
lightning_time
wh57batt
Currently they are not in the database, so have you updated the database
with these fields or just forget them?
Thanks to Oliver for the help.
Gert
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 at 10:28:48
Hi Oliver,
also many thanks from my site to jump in here again!
Will also test asap...
Best regards,
Matthias
Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2020 20:44:27 UTC+2 schrieb olicat:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just made another attempt. Perhaps this helps ...
>
>
Thank you Oliver, I made that change and was able to start WeeWX with no
errors - now just to wait for some lightning!
Normally that's an almost every afternoon occurrence this time of year in
Florida, but as my luck would have it, the forecast looks unusually clear
right now.
Thank you for
Hi,
I just made another attempt. Perhaps this helps ...
https://github.com/matthewwall/weewx-interceptor/issues/69
Regards, Oliver
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
Looks like the driver is trying to convert the string to a float.
'lightning': ''
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Me too and I gave up for the moment...
I started now to investigate if PWS_Dashboard could be the better solution
for me as more Sensors are supported, as well the WH57.
Also Wim gives a great support and feedback...
My PWS-Site, still not ready but operational..._
Me too and I gave up for the moment...
But I play currently with PWS_Dasboard which is very well supported by
Wim...
https://www.fitzbek-wetter.de/pwsWDxx/index.php
Regards,
Matthias
Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2020 17:44:40 UTC+2 schrieb Gert Andersen:
>
> Hi
>
> I did the same and got the same
Hi
I did the same and got the same error.
Running Weewx 4.1.1
Gert
On Thursday, June 18, 2020 at 2:12:23 AM UTC+2, Benjamin Trey Blue wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for the patched interceptor driver - I just got a WH57 for my
> GW1000 and am trying to get the observations added to the WeeWX
Hello,
Thank you for the patched interceptor driver - I just got a WH57 for my
GW1000 and am trying to get the observations added to the WeeWX DB. With
the patched driver, the lightning observations are showing in my raw
packets:
weewx[29068] DEBUG user.interceptor: raw packet: {'wind_speed':
Hi Gert,
I contacted Oliver for advise today - he is the "father" of the great
generic Foshkplugin:
https://www.loxwiki.eu/display/LOXBERRY/FOSHKplugin+-+generic+version
He answered and already and replied on Github:
https://github.com/matthewwall/weewx-interceptor/issues/69
Further he send me
Hi NanoG5Kite
Thanks for your help.
I guess I also must create the lightning fields in th DB or will the sensor
map extension do that?
I'm already at the patched version to solve another warning.
Gert
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 at 11:48:05 AM UTC+2, NanoG5Kite wrote:
>
>
> And for this:
>>
> And for this:
>
>
https://github.com/matthewwall/weewx-interceptor/pull/64/commits/00bdecdc1822d7deaa7c41f20dfc4c30a349936d
You could use in the meantime the patched bin/user/interceptor.py -
enclosed:
>
> Hi,
>
I can not really help you yet as my WH57 is not delivered yet, but on
github:
https://github.com/matthewwall/weewx-interceptor
Might this be an option to define a WH57 mapping in the weewx.conf?
Driver options
To configure the driver beyond the default values, set parameters in
26 matches
Mail list logo
