On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 8:02:24 PM UTC-7, Xant wrote:
>
> Davis is known as the "cadillac" (prestige) of PWSs. Measurement seems
> precise at short time rate update. I can not advocate, as I never own one,
> due to pricing, outdated display and extra interface.
>
You've cross-posted the
Davis is known as the "cadillac" (prestige) of PWSs. Measurement seems
precise at short time rate update. I can not advocate, as I never own one,
due to pricing, outdated display and extra interface.
I went through few "budget" PWSs, that is Acurite (5x1, Atlas) and Ambient
Weather (ws-1550-ip)
Vince
Yes... aware of 3secs for Wind, and 60 for data loop. But it is interesting
that the 3sec Wind kicks MQTT (that's why mentioned "looks like Davis") :P
So far, and for the price point, enjoying WF.
Returned both Acurite Atlas (Atlas had a UV sensor problem, which seems an
unusual instanc
Pat
Yes, I'm much familiar with Static Lease IP and addressed to WF.
The comment was the lack of jack net port, as it is a net Hub, and I do
prefer hard-wire when possible (stability, static IP, etc).
Xant
PS: Thanks much for Belchertown skin! Nice, elegant and clean (I crossed by
other day
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 10:04:47 PM UTC-7, Xant wrote:
>
>- MQTT updates at <3secs (maybe due to wind, but looks like a Davis);
>I never had MQTT turn-out that quick... besides the 60sec actual loop
>update timeframe (weewx website seems much quicker than "is"; but that
I don't have a WF, but the lack of static IP may not be an issue if your
router is able to do DHCP Reservations.
If you can get the MAC Address of the device, and set a DHCP Reservation
for it, then the device will get the same IP every time it renews its DHCP
lease. This is how I manage all my
Just got WF... so far, Im impress...
Pros:
- much sensors than any other, at this price point
- MQTT updates at <3secs (maybe due to wind, but looks like a Davis); I
never had MQTT turn-out that quick... besides the 60sec actual loop update
timeframe (weewx website seems much quicke
On Friday, August 30, 2019 at 9:40:42 AM UTC-7, Xant wrote:
>
> So, if no other major feedback or concerns regarding the 2 units (or other
> systems advice), I might give WeatherFlow a try.
>
>
Check out their forums for many more details than I could ever remember off
the top of my head.
I boug
Thanks for notes Vince
1) WeatherFlow
things I like (or intrigue):
- no moving parts
- sensors: brightness, UV index, solar irradiance, temp, humidity,
pressure, lightning
- UDP API
- rain not a major issue
cons:
- 60sec loop
cost:
- seems Ok for a no-moving parts s
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 7:27:18 AM UTC-7, Xant wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, AmbientWeather w ObserverIP data cycles every
> 16seconds, while WeatherFlow every 60secs. Sure, it is a major (and long
> cycle, specially when compared with Davis).
>
>
You probably want to surf the WeatherFlo
Thanks Vince
If I'm not mistaken, AmbientWeather w ObserverIP data cycles every
16seconds, while WeatherFlow every 60secs. Sure, it is a major (and long
cycle, specially when compared with Davis).
But, if ObserverIP can not handle anything at all (as it seems happening),
then WeatherFlow (as
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 7:11:15 AM UTC-7, Xant wrote:
> Any feedback regarding WeatherFlow & WeeWX?
>
>
Tastes great. Less filling.
It works just fine.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and st
12 matches
Mail list logo
