Re: [Wengophone-devel] Patch for lupdate macro on Linux

2007-04-03 Thread Claudio André
Hi They are too different, so, i attached both. Anyway, running make lupdate i got: Updating 'wengophone/src/presentation/qt/lang/qtwengophone_fr.ts'... Found 874 source texts (16 new and 858 already existing) Removed 40 obsolete entries Same-text heuristic provided 9 translations So

Re: [Wengophone-devel] Patch for lupdate macro on Linux

2007-04-03 Thread Dave Neary
Hi Claudio, What's the diff when compared to the .pro file generated by make lupdate? Cheers, Dave. Claudio André wrote: > Me too. > > But mine lang.pro file (qmake -project -o lang.pro) gives me almost 900 > strings, removing only 8 obsolete strings. > > Probably, i have some trash on my 2.1

Re: [Wengophone-devel] Patch for lupdate macro on Linux

2007-04-02 Thread Claudio André
Me too. But mine lang.pro file (qmake -project -o lang.pro) gives me almost 900 strings, removing only 8 obsolete strings. Probably, i have some trash on my 2.1 branch folder. Claudio Dave Neary escreveu: Hi Laudio, Claudio André wrote: I noticed your ts files have 868 strings. Mine ha

Re: [Wengophone-devel] Patch for lupdate macro on Linux

2007-04-02 Thread Dave Neary
Hi Laudio, Claudio André wrote: > I noticed your ts files have 868 strings. Mine have 898. Any > possibilities your .pro file is outdated? On the contrary - I ran lupdate with -noobsolete, which removes the strings by a good bit. There are also one or two small test GUI programs whose strings ar

Re: [Wengophone-devel] Patch for lupdate macro on Linux

2007-04-02 Thread Claudio André
Hi, I noticed your ts files have 868 strings. Mine have 898. Any possibilities your .pro file is outdated? Claudio Dave Neary escreveu: Hi, After applying this patch, I have updated the .ts files - here's a diff against Subversion once we run lupdate -noobsolete on the .pro file generated b

Re: [Wengophone-devel] Patch for lupdate macro on Linux

2007-04-02 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, After applying this patch, I have updated the .ts files - here's a diff against Subversion once we run lupdate -noobsolete on the .pro file generated by cmake. Could anyone involved in translation have a glance at this, and make sure that it's OK, before it gets committed, please? I don't wa

[Wengophone-devel] Patch for lupdate macro on Linux

2007-04-02 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Tanguy and I patched the OWLocaleUpdate cmake file to have the arguments before the name of the .pro file on the 2.1 branch (since on Linux and mac, they must come first - while I was at it, I also print the lupdate binary that we're calling, to ensure we're not accidentally picking up the qt