I'm not going to commit anything on Gryphon Mountain because no amount
of store_unit magic will save us from when the attack event's WML
get's processed... I do have a feature request here:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=12681
hint. hint. :)
If nobody else has
I tested the -20% XP think, and if you add a description it just
appends the -20% XP in brackets... That looks odd. There is something
sitting in a source file someplace... but that's not my department. :)
The forums are filling up with complaints about the current Ulf stats
in multiplayer making them too powerful. The general consensus seems
to be that they need to be toned down. I suggest their cost should be
raised by 2gp and the hitpoints reduced by 2.
hitpoints 40 -> 38
cost 18 -> 20
>The forums are filling up with complaints about the current Ulf stats
>in multiplayer making them too powerful. The general consensus seems
>to be that they need to be toned down. I suggest their cost should be
>raised by 2gp and the hitpoints reduced by 2.
>
>hitpoints 40 -> 38
>cost 18
I don't mind seeing him toned down, but as Nils said, I think the
current state of berzerk (no berzerk on defense) is very important to
have.
It's not terribly consequential for multiplayer, but it is extremely
important for campaigns where the player owns the units, and is even
more so when
me four.
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Richard Kettering wrote:
> I don't mind seeing him toned down, but as Nils said, I think the
> current state of berzerk (no berzerk on defense) is very important to
> have.
>
> It's not terribly consequential for multiplayer, but it is extremely
> important for c
James Barton send that mail only to me, so i'll forward it to the ml.
I don't think that lowering HP and Cost would be an "easier" way of
balancing the Ulf - it would make them slightly rarer, yes, but not
reduce their lethality in combat.
I personally prefer lowering HP and Resistances. Par
> Hitpoints 40 -> 38
> Resistances -> 0% (For all physical damage)
> [Cost 18 -> 19?]
>
> James
> a.k.a. Sangel
I would endorse this proposal with the only change being that the
resistances be moved from 30 20 20 10 20 20 to 20 10 10 0 10 20 as
seen on: http://wesnoth.slack.it/units.cgi?movetypes
