Patrick Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > While I'm perfectly capable of maintaining wmllint, I'd rather not start > adding to my responsibilities. Honestly, I'm surprised you would resort to > such an ultimatum / threat considering it was your foresight to hedge for > this likelihood in the first place. > > I'm conviced by your argument against version stamping, but still opposed to > your second point for reasons stated. The gains just don't outweigh the > disadvantages. I'd rather have a logical discussion about it than to start > making ultimatums, though. As a long-time WML author I had hoped you'd value > my input a bit more.
I value your input a lot, actually. But I could see the discussion was going to turn into a pure value conflict with no logical resolution. Neither of us has time for that, so I cut to the chase. Please think of this as showing respect for your time, as well as mine. I meant it that way. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev