On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 09:43:16AM -0500, Joseph Simmons wrote:
> To me, EP's gold tweaks also seem like the perfect way to completely
> unbalance every single campaign. They are a good idea, and will
> eventually need to be done, but when they are we are going to have to
> change the amount of gol
To me, EP's gold tweaks also seem like the perfect way to completely
unbalance every single campaign. They are a good idea, and will
eventually need to be done, but when they are we are going to have to
change the amount of gold the AI has in almost all campaign scenarios.
So, we should only commit
Nils Kneuper wrote:
I just found another problem in the MP-mode. I think it will be very
hard (not to say impossible) to ballance all the eras. I think all the
balancing has recently been concentrated on the default era. I think
this is a good thing. But the other eras are really not ballanced.
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:15:25PM +0200, Nils Kneuper wrote:
> I think we should only ship the default era with 1.0 and make the
> other ones "extra content" on the campaign server. Maybe we could
> include a fairly balanced Age of Heroes, but some time has to be taken
> for this. That is the only
I just found another problem in the MP-mode. I think it will be very
hard (not to say impossible) to ballance all the eras. I think all the
balancing has recently been concentrated on the default era. I think
this is a good thing. But the other eras are really not ballanced. I
also think it is not
